• EtherWhack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’d be worried about the ones charged with driving under the influence. It could easily be a way of profiling, given that there isn’t any objective way to prove someone’s high and not just having consumed within a couple days. The only current way that I know of is a field sobriety test, which can be a bit subjective.

    • Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      given that there isn’t any objective way to prove someone’s high and not just having consumed within a couple days

      You can do blood tests for THC, which are a reliable measure.

      You are probably thinking of THC-COOH urine or saliva tests, which indeed will show positive for days or even weeks after you are already sober again, since THC-COOH is a metabolite of THC that takes very long to break down and does not have psychoactive properties

      Just do it how Canada does it, they have a very reasonable cut-off value for THC blood concentration that even regular consumers with a tolerance for THC won’t surpass while sober again

      • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        You can, but did they in the cases in question?

        Going forward, it’s a good thing that a method exists to test if someone actually is driving high.

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          Oh, I’m sure lots of them were wrongfully committed based on inaccurate urine tests or field sobriety tests, no doubt about that