I have a problem with politicians misleading the electorate (yes, I know that’s sadly common).
While I think UvdL is incompetent, corrupt and should be in prison, I am also a democrat and therefor accept that politicians I don’t agree with can and will be elected. What I can’t accept is telling the voter “if you vote for party A, we will put B in office and do C” and then after the election doing a 180, putting X in office and/or doing Y. Because at that point voting becomes roulette instead of an informed decision.
I would have less of a problem if they hadn’t promoted the whole front runner thing in the first place, because then they wouldn’t have falsely advertised their intentions. EU institutions beside the parliament have a legitimacy issue already, stunts like this only emphasize that.
It doesn’t sound like you have a problem with the way elections are done but more about who was elected?
What you suggested doesn’t change the way the president is chosen.
I don’t know why UvdL was chosen. Do you?
I have a problem with politicians misleading the electorate (yes, I know that’s sadly common).
While I think UvdL is incompetent, corrupt and should be in prison, I am also a democrat and therefor accept that politicians I don’t agree with can and will be elected. What I can’t accept is telling the voter “if you vote for party A, we will put B in office and do C” and then after the election doing a 180, putting X in office and/or doing Y. Because at that point voting becomes roulette instead of an informed decision.
I would have less of a problem if they hadn’t promoted the whole front runner thing in the first place, because then they wouldn’t have falsely advertised their intentions. EU institutions beside the parliament have a legitimacy issue already, stunts like this only emphasize that.