• Arbiter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Except they have full control over those cameras and the footage they record.

    Anytime there’s misconduct they just refuse to release the footage or they turn off the camera.

      • Arbiter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Except even when they are filmed nothing happens, they just get paid leave or shuffled to another department.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Before video evidence became a thing, almost 0% of police brutality would face any consequences. With video, its now non-zero, should be ideally at 100%, but getting the statistic away from 0% is a great start. The murderer or George Floyd would’ve walked away without video evidence. When there’s more cameras, the odds of punishment is better than without cameras.

          • Arbiter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s a fair point, I’m just skeptical how much of a difference a new tech gadget can make on systemic issues.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          At least then the victim’s family can get a wrongful death payout. It would be even better if they abolished qualified immunity.