Nothing more disappointing to me than seeing a game I might enjoy… and then it’s only available on PC on Epic Games store. Why can’t it be available on Epic, Xbox game store and Steam? It’s so annoying, like you have no choice but to use Epic… which I would literally do ANYTHING not to use.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    And it sucks, whether it’s a surprise or not.

    I’m not angrier at something being absent from Steam because Epic paid for an exclusive than I am at any other reason why a game wouldn’t make it to my storefront of choice.

    Which is, let’s be clear, very lightly angry. This is choosing a store to buy videogames, not seeking revenge for my clan in holy war.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t see exclusives the same as a company choosing to not release a product on a certain storefront. One is a choice that can be changed and another is a contract.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Contracts can, in fact, be changed.

        Those are pretty similar deals, honestly. In many cases the exclusivity deal gets signed because without the up-front cash the game can’t get done. You give up some long-term sales for the up front money and the better revenue split. In both cases it’s about resources.

        And, again, in both cases that decision can be reviewed later. Either because it’s baked into the timed exclusivity or because all contracts can be amended.

        But also, there isn’t a moral stance here. As a user I care about where and how I can play the game, I don’t care about the reasons. I don’t need to approve your business agreements before I play your videogame, I’m not your lawyer.

        • stardust@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          It’s nicer to not need a contract that needs to be changed. Already enough obstacles of even getting a pc port for some games without it.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Oh, it’s nicer for them, I assume, but again, I’m not your bizdev guy. Their lawyers can do the paperwork, I just care about the game.

            Plus, I think you’re misjudging PC ports. The “obstacles” are actually for shipping on consoles, which require expensive dev kits and complex certification and submission requirements. PC ports are easy, you probably have a PC build running for development anyway and PC platforms really don’t give a crap about compliance requirements.

            If it’s not on PC it’s a business decision, not about complexities. Having to sign a contract in exchange for money isn’t an “added obstacle”, it’s a motivation to do it in the first place.

              • MudMan@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                All else being equal, yes, I prefer games being platform agnostic.

                If I have to choose, though, I only care about them being available on PC in the first place (and on GOG, DRM-free, if at all possible). And I certainly, certainly, am nowhere near getting mad at them signing a deal to get money from Epic in exchange for exclusivity. Go hussle, game devs. Do what you gotta do to get by. If anything, it sucks how much less commerically viable doing that seems to be than just launching on Steam alone, going by the performance of recent Ubisoft releases.