Watch "Gusano - United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson killer: Collects shell casings Shot to the heart from behind Silencer (banned in NYC) Great “hiding” skills This dude was a pro" on Streamable.
sounds like someone doesn’t realize that lawyers pay attention to juries while the case is tried and can file for mistrial due to some fabricated context of jury contamination through media before a verdict is given.
Once the trial begins, it’s not a easy for the prosecution to get a mistral without prejudice attached. There have to be grounds on which the mistral is based.
“We’re going to lose because the jury is going to rule against us” is not adequate grounds for a mistrial.
I would argue if we got a jury to say he was not guilty because shooting a Rich Ghool was Defence, it would cause FAR more worries than a simple nulification.
Kinda. It has to be a crime in both jurisdictions, and it’s only between state and federal systems. Two different courts in the same state are under the same judicial authority, so they can’t both try you.
If you commit bank robbery for example, you’ve invariably committed armed robbery in a state against an entity under federal jurisdiction. That means they can both prosecute.
The feds don’t have jurisdiction for murder in a typical new York sidewalk.
If they find the guy, I hope the jury nullifies.
the prosecution would just file for mistrial and try again.
Can’t mistrial a jury verdict.
so lawyers are dumb as fuck and can’t clearly tell a jury is going to slamdunk them?
thats what jury selection is ment to stop. But after that, gloves off.
The prosecution doesn’t get to file for mistrial after a jury has rendered its verdict
you are correct, but if you hire a lawyer instead of a wet sponge they can feel the jury out and file mistrial during proceedings.
I think this would require a hung jury
Sounds like someone learned about US laws in US schools.
sounds like someone doesn’t realize that lawyers pay attention to juries while the case is tried and can file for mistrial due to some fabricated context of jury contamination through media before a verdict is given.
Once the trial begins, it’s not a easy for the prosecution to get a mistral without prejudice attached. There have to be grounds on which the mistral is based.
“We’re going to lose because the jury is going to rule against us” is not adequate grounds for a mistrial.
Better yet they do a whole case about how this is justified defence from all the deaths that guy was causing
That works as well. Anything to make these ghouls actually sweat a bit about the needless suffering they cause for monopoly money
I would argue if we got a jury to say he was not guilty because shooting a Rich Ghool was Defence, it would cause FAR more worries than a simple nulification.
They would just retry in federal with the most stacked jury in us history.
Double jepordy, I would hope cracks would atleast become glaring if that happened
Double jeopardy only protects you from retrial from the same entity.
I think its the same crime period, reguardless of who tries it.
Kinda. It has to be a crime in both jurisdictions, and it’s only between state and federal systems. Two different courts in the same state are under the same judicial authority, so they can’t both try you.
If you commit bank robbery for example, you’ve invariably committed armed robbery in a state against an entity under federal jurisdiction. That means they can both prosecute.
The feds don’t have jurisdiction for murder in a typical new York sidewalk.
Only in the short term!