Summary

Reddit’s r/medicine moderators deleted a thread where doctors and users harshly criticized murdered UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

Comments, including satirical rejections of insurance claims for gunshot wounds, targeted UHC’s reputation for denying care to boost profits.

Despite the removal, similar discussions continue, with medical professionals condemning UHC’s business practices under Thompson’s leadership, which a Senate report recently criticized for denying post-acute care.

Thompson, shot in what appears to be a targeted attack, led a company notorious for its high claim denial rates, fueling ongoing debates about corporate ethics in healthcare.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    It still should. The paradox of tolerance just means you have to not tolerate the intolerant, not actively mock them. I mean sometimes that can be fun, but let’s be honest, they even took out the wrong guy (they’ll just get a new CEO who’ll hardline the stance even more and waste money on a ton of bodyguards, hopefully at least Gaddafi-style). Should have gone after the shareholders, that’ll really hurt the business model after all. The CEO is just a representative figure who puts his name under decisions that are 99,5% not driven by him.

    Was is still the correct choice to take him out because he is a billionaire and a murderous asshole? I’ll say no, because I don’t believe in death penalty on account of it being too lenient. Should have thrown him down a well and let him starve slowly, or at least delivered death by immurement or something. Something slow, ideally decades slow. But that’s besides the point, overall he also deserves fuck all sympathy because he was still a) a billionaire and b) the CEO of one of the most cruel companies around, rivaling black ops stuff and far outdoing them in the lives lost to their practices.

    • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Speaking of the pradoxof tolerance, Karl Popper realized that intolerance often involves violence.
      I, for one would argue that health insurance denying claims arbitrarily asserts violence in some way - even worse to especially vulnerable people.

      So how do you imagine not tolerating this kind of intolerance?
      Writing stern letters and emails? That seems to have happened.
      Starting a legal battle that might be decided in your favour after you’ve died from not receiving health care due to denied claims?
      What would you suggest?

      Popper also draws attention to the fact that intolerance is often asserted through the use of violence […]

      Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance#Proposed_solutions