• Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    We HoLd A dEeP ReSpEcT…

    Yeah hiring AI slop to take down websites with zero humanity oversight screams “respect.”

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      It wouldn’t be so bad if the AI engaged with a human at some point to confirm the action was both warranted and proportionate. Nope, apparently it’s allowed to just do whatever the hell it wants, with literally zero oversight.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Corporations are trying to set the precedent that they can not be held responsible for what their AI does. If it required an employee action to follow through then there’s a point of liability. Zero oversight isn’t a bug of AI, it’s a feature. It puts more distance between the people at the top and any liability or consequences they might face.

        ‘Why I could not have known this software was wrong 90% of the time, I’m not a computer scientist. It’s beside the point that all those mistakes AI from the company we contracted were in our favor. Regardless that’s in the past, the new generation of Artificial Intelligence will correct those mistakes and will detect 10% more fraud. It’s wonderful that we finally have a tool to combat the rampant fraud and bad actors that has taken over this country.’