• morriscox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    They sometimes use the IP of others and it can be a real headache or impossible to get permission from everyone.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 days ago

      This argument seems hollow, releasing source code is not an all or nothing situation. They can just release what they are allowed to, and let the community replace the missing stuff.

      Releasing anything is better than releasing nothing and letting the community reverse engineer everything instead of just some third-party libraries.

      • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        But also, in a world where such a law did exist, it would naturally force every third-party to create their contracts in a way that would allow the eventual release of the source code, or lose out on the deal and subsequently, the money.

        • cmhe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          When we are talking about laws, yes you are right.

          I was arguing more about developers not releasing the source code on their own, when they stopped releasing patches, or even remove the game from stores or shutdown servers, while stating that reason: “We cannot because we use third-party stuff.”

          No, they just do not want to. They might even think that their past games are in competition to their current games. So they do not want people to play (and improve/mod) them anymore.