• brossman@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    3 days ago

    so they’re going to spend a whole bunch of the companies money on security firms, it’s definitely going to come out of the executive compensation and not the workers, right? …right?

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t dn’t see how that’s profitable. If I were on the board I would just make sure their life insurance was paid up. Management is completely disposable. If they die, then you just get a new one, plus the insurance payout.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m sure most shareholders would agree with you.

        The trouble is that most shareholders own their shares through mutual funds in their retirement accounts, and those shares get voted by the fund managers at Vanguard/Black Rock/Fidelity/etc. Those people definitely are part of the good ol’ boys club and will definitely vote in the executives’ interest and against their clients’.

    • microphone900@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ha! They’ll take it from the workers AND raise the prices of whatever products they’re selling then pass the cost onto us for a tidy bit of extra profit. The leeches have to suck as much blood out of us as possible.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Owners have to make these officers feel secure again… so we will pay for the security… they can’t have their comp cut just because some hero murdered their peer.