• Cypher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    There are clickless exploits and other methods that don’t require you to enter information, nevermind that nearly all of these menus have ordering and payment available through them and mimicking websites is fairly simple.

    QR codes cannot be trusted just like links from unknown sources cannot be trusted.

    • gila@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think you’ll find there isn’t an Android or iPhone on the market today vulnerable to SQL injection or XSS etc via scanning a QR code. You’re talking about device vulnerabilities that get patched and it’s equally possible to encounter these exploits with plaintext URLs

      • Arcka@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If the restaurant doesn’t have a good enough reputation that I couldn’t trust the QR they provided (which displays the URL so I can inspect it before launching the web browser), I also wouldn’t want to trust my health to eating there.

        It isn’t like some random thing you found on the sidewalk.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re talking about device vulnerabilities that get patched

        Patching out zero days takes time.

        it’s equally possible to encounter these exploits with plaintext URLs

        Yes which is why I clearly stated that following URLs from any unknown sources carries risk.

        The difference is that due to menus being a point of payment they have a greater incentive for abuse.

        • gila@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          So we shouldn’t use smartphone features if they could potentially have exploits? With this logic you shouldn’t have a phone.

          • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            We shouldn’t replace perfectly good solutions with unreliable, cumbersome, insecure, annoying shitty tech just because.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Thinking that simply visiting a web site for a business you’ve already decided to patronize is dangerous is some serious boomer logic.

              • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                If we only focus on the security part, how the do you know it’s even their site you’re visiting? Often those qr codes are just stickers on table, trivial to slap a new one there

                But it also adds a lot of annoyance for customers who came to eat food, not doomscroll on their fucking mobile phone