I told my boss I had an idea for a program that could improve efficiency across much of the business, and he let me build it on company time. In the long term, he wanted to be able to sell it to other companies. However, the program never got implemented due to personnel mismanagement, and I’d rather be able to post it on my github under a free licence so I can use it as a resume item, and at least someone would have the chance to actually use it. It’s all still in my head, and I could write it again if I wanted. If I do, is it illegal to publish it? What if I write it in a different language? Do I need to change the variable names? I did plenty of research and planning on company time to build it, and it’s not like I can research it again, it’s all still in my head.

  • BB_C@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Meh, everyone scaring you into thinking you don’t own your own mind.

    Assuming your boss is not the dangerous kind (beyond legal threats), and if the goal is to make it FOSS, then do it using an alias first. Do it differently. Use components/libs/algos from other people at first, even if they are not perfect. Make those parts easily pluggable/replaceable which would be good design anyway. The code then wouldn’t be wholly yours, not even your alias self.

    You can join the project later with your real identity as an interested domain expert (maybe a bit after not working for the same boss). Start contributing. Become a maintainer. And maybe take over after a while. You can start replacing non-optimal components/libs/algos with better ones piecemeal.

    Oh, and if Rust wasn’t the choice of implementation, use it this time.

      • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        “Make those parts pluggable/replaceable which would be a good design anyways”.

        Following best practices = Morally Wrong?
        Sure, fren, whatever you say.

        The only reason OP might not have done it this way in the first place would have been to save the company worrying about licensing, or getting shitty with OP about not using enough orignal/proprietary code to ensure lock-in with future clients … is THAT somehow morally superior in your book?

  • scorpionix@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not a lawyer but from my understanding of intellectual property: You wrote it on company time, so it is the companies code. Publishing it without explicit approval would be copyright infringement.

    • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The code on the computer isn’t what I would be publishing. I would be publishing the memories in my head, which I had written down again

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Don’t copy the code directly from any company assets. There are plenty of ways to track code and data theft these days, so don’t even attempt it. I am just saying that as a friendly reminder.

        Honestly, there is not much that a company can do unless they specially own the business logic of what you are doing. Are there aspects to the code that apply to internal proprietary software? That probably isn’t wise to share.

        While I am not a lawyer, a general rule of thumb is that if you think you might be stealing something, you probably are. Anything you do on company time, is technically owned by that company.

        If your previous work gets discarded by that company, never talk about it again. Never code it again for that company and just let the idea die, as far as that company is concerned. Independently resurrect the idea at a later date.

        Nobody here can really tell you what to do, btw. Quite honestly, if you think that you can claim ownership of what you have, pay a few hundred bucks for a consultation with a lawyer.