• Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Actual art criticism is a bit more nuanced and based on a fundamental grounding of understanding with the medium.

    If you walk up to a Jackson Pollock painting and say ‘That’s bad’, literally no one interested in painting will call your statement art criticism.

        • Yer Ma@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Come on, who hasn’t been to the MOMA? Honestly I was kinda joking, I’m not a fan of abstract splatter-type arts, to me that kind of thing seems incredibly self centered of the artist and ofter low effort or wasted effort without conveying a universal beauty of any kind and instead forcing viewers to have to accept that the artist must have seen something that they don’t… It’s not friendly or inviting as an experience for anyone that isn’t in the “know”, you know?

          • Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I have to agree that a lot of ‘modern’ art is pretentious and self-indulgent, for this one artist I put aside my distaste after seeing one up close. It’s not just paint splatters, there’s work in the texture. They’re more of kind of 3d art than anything.

            That said, thinks like that joker who taped a banana to a gallery wall just piss me of to no end.