cataas - not to be confused with catass
cataas - not to be confused with catass
currently being tested
They’ve been “testing” it for more than a decade at this point and even if Russia is able to actually bring the T-14 into service, they won’t be able to produce any significant number of them for the same reason their tank corps isn’t using many T-90M right now.
pure garbage
Go look up Operation Desert Storm and rethink what you wrote there.
If there’s anything here that’s garbage, it’s your notions about tank design.
more manoeuvrable
Ah yes, there’s nothing quite like a 4 km/h reverse speed. That’s a really tangible factor making the T-72 a better tank.
Da braucht man schon viel kriminelle Energie für. Otto Normalverbraucher findet vmtl. nicht mal die F5 Taste…
Wait till you find out what Russia and China are doing on Facebook
Bleibt noch die Möglichkeit, dass 1400 der 1800 Lemmy Nutzer Einwohner von Lieberose sind
Who cares? They’re just pedestrians, it’s not like they’re honest car-driving citizens
~ 'murica
It really depends on what you want. My experience with Gnome extensions has been rather frustrating. For example, finding a working and maintained extension for app indicators is a pain - and you have to do it again for each new release when inevitably the extension is no longer updated.
…what? SpaceX is years behind schedule for delivering crewed space flight to NASA. US tax payers have had to cough up billions of dollars for seats on Russian Soyuz spacecraft to at least be able to get to space somehow in the meantime.
Iterating and failing is okay, but SpaceX has neither been faster nor cheaper in doing so than NASA’s original moon landing program.
With LibreWolf you also have to trust
…what?
Also, you should probably mark this as NSFW with a title like that.
Bei dem Weg: Es heißt “rechtmäßig”, ohne “s”
They missed April fools by about a month
I wouldn’t call criticism of their strategic focus “shitting on” Nextcloud. It obviously still does a lot of things right or at least right enough to be useful and relevant to many people, or else we wouldn’t be discussing it. But it has its issues and many of them have been unadressed for a long time, so why shouldn’t people voice their displeasure with that?
How to write a package in R
Step 1: Use C++
Sounds like a “no true Scotsman” argument tbh
I’m skeptical given how confident many recent AI models are at making wrong claims. Fact checking seems to be a rather poor use case for current AI models IMO.
cringe-worthy
Says the person who is licensing their Lemmy comments.
+1 for restic. I’ve been using it for four years now and have never encountered an issue, including during my yearly restore practice run.
As far as B2 bucket encryption is concerned, I wouldn’t trust it as far as I can throw it. Quite honestly, it could just be a fancy checkbox on their website without any actual encryption, and we wouldn’t be able to tell. Either way, a compromise of Backblaze would put your data at risk.
Wouldn’t
(30px)²
be30*30*px*px
and thus900px²
?