Chana [none/use name]

  • 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 7 days ago
cake
Cake day: May 17th, 2025

help-circle
  • Others already have good recommendations for the provider so I will add some other notes.

    First, please note that with the way DNS works, your home IP will now be recognizable as “the IP this domain points to” so make sure the chain of networking devices are secure, starting at your router. At minimum make sure the router firmware is up to date. The only way to avoid this kind of thing is to have a VPS as an intermediary, essentially a tunnel, though there are fancy new ways of making tunnels more powerful, like self-hosting tailscale-like services. But that has its own security downside, which is trusting the VPS provider. I think a DNS entry for your own home IP is generally better in terms of security vs. time invested but the VPS can be made theoretically superior by being careful with cryptographic strategy.

    Second, yes you can, generally speaking, forward external requests on a given port to a local network IP and port. This is a decent way to slightly obfuscate ssh. By default it is port 22, so instead of opening 22 externally, you make some high-number (like 55342) port externally route to a server on port 22 locally. When sshing externally you just specify the high number port. Your router firmware may limit how well this works.

    Third, yes the IP changing can cause DNS problems. You can set up a dynamic DNS service that changes your DNS records if your router external IP changes. If you run router firmware like OpenWRT the router itself can run this service. But you can also run dynamic DNS on a local server and have it do the same thing. Using a provider with a good API like porkbun makes this easier.






  • I think regular education about mutual aid would be helpful. For example, while anonymity does mean capacity for harm and then reacting meta posts, look at what happens when donating to, e.g., charities: you end up mostly paying for PMC paychecks and tax breaks for corpos. Edit: maybe adding an explainer comment pinned in every mutual aid post would be a good way to implement this.

    I do think that having a vouching system is the best way and my understanding is that this is basically the status quo to some extent. You may want to define some kind of unvouching process in cases where there are verifiable issues. I think this will actually increase trust and donations if communication and messaging are on-point.

    So re: meta posts, I think there needs to be more process, not just allowing meta posts and comments. This requires more mod intervention, so I’m sorry to be basically volunteering others’ time, but I do think it will be beneficial to have meta posts go through a filter and deliberative process and with clear results and strategic messaging. The alternative, i.e. status quo, is likely to be ad hoc discouragement. The coupling of “this is why you should keep helping our comrades” to any meta posts is very important.








  • I think Ghorman has a mix of inspirations. I think its main character is different from Gaza, however, and in ways that matter.

    spoilers

    Ghorman is portrayed as vaguely Western European, with French-Germanic language, exclusively white people, a wealthy country with one make export: extremely expensive textiles made of silk. They are not portrayed as imperialized, but as a wealthy and proud group. Their racial characteristics are in line with those of the empire, just without British accents, whereas imperialized groups in Star Wars are depicted as racially diverse humans or “aliens”.

    The Ghorman resistance is portrayed as incompetent and arrogant, generally unserious and making poor strategic choices. They are constantly surprised by the outcomes of their actions. They do not listen to the free advice of people with more experience and revolutionary resources. Their main leader is literally a wealthy businessman nationalist. The people under him are naive youths. They have no consistent goal or idea of how they accomplish the major goal of removing occupation. They think a big show of “peaceful protest” and singing songs in a square will work and are massacred for it. Very late in the game their main leader realizes his idealism will lead to this massacre but nobody listens to him. He has no caché even among his alleged subordinates. They are a liberal bourgeois shitshow. They are even depicted as a color revolution in many ways.

    Ghorman is closer to the idea of fascism returning home, or otherwise betraying its allies for its own interest. It has the one common attribute with Gaza, which is genocide and forced migration by an imperialist group, but it is not done for colonization, but resource extraction. They’re mining a mineral so extensively that it ruins habitability. There is no real precedent for this among Euro imperialists: they destroy habitability via extraction outside the imperial core, not within it. Even when conquering one another! Ghorman us a mixture of elements.

    But the main “message” of Ghorman is that “if it can happen to us, it can happen to you”, something that wouldn’t make sense if they were already considered marginal and downtrodden. Ghorman are insiders of the Empire, they are rich, they are ethnically privileged, but the Empire saw it necessary to destroy them to keep the rest of their subjects in line via a superweapon, so Ghorman was destroyed. And via the propaganda apparatus, consent for this was manufactured and bourgeois democrats sold it as a necessary evil against an arrogant state gone rogue.