And feeling hot shame. For as long as you choose to.

That or maybe answer, unless you’re afraid of admitting to having a aid something wrong? Don’t worry, it’s a normal part of development, but you won’t get any where unless you learn this lesson. Prolly you won’t, in like a week or two you won’t even be able yo delude yourself and you’ll rage out and block me. Because you can’t answer a question my niece could. :DD

Which one of the following English sentences would you use to express admiration and adoration of a person?

“[female celebrity] is my heroine!”

OR

“[female celebrity] is my hero!”

See if you use the first one, as your rhetoric implies you want to, and think everyone should participate in this needless gendering, then you’re implicitly saying you don’t understand that saying “x is my heroin” outloud means you’re addicted to something instead of admiring it (and that you don’t understand that “hero” is the colloquially used form). Which leads us back to me having a better command of the English language than you, making this conversation rather futile. <3

Make one of those dildo models of your dong and then manufacture them on top of that. Although nowhere to really hygienically store them prolly and out of shape and all and

Yes, it is. Every single messages you obsessively come back here for is proof it. As the kids say “rent-free in your head”.

Here, I’ll show you;

Which one of the following English sentences would you use to express admiration and adoration of a person? “[Female celebrity] is my heroine!” OR “[female celebrity] is my hero!”? See if you use the first one, as your rhetoric implies you want to, and think everyone should participate in this needless gendering, then you’re implicitly saying you don’t understand that saying “x is my heroin” outloud means you’re addicted to something instead of admiring it (and that you don’t understand that “hero” is the colloquially used form).

You’ll do this tantrum for some days/weeks until even you start feeling that you’re acting like a hangry toddler.

Answer the simple question and prove me wrong.

Which one of the following English sentences would you use to express admiration and adoration of a person; “[female celebrity] is my heroine!” OR “[female celebrity] is my hero!”? See if you use the first one, as your rhetoric implies you want to, and think everyone should participate in this needless gendering, then you’re implicitly saying you don’t understand that saying “x is my heroin” outloud means you’re addicted to something instead of admiring it (and that you don’t understand that “hero” is the colloquially used form).

It isn’t complex, but if you admitted you don’t know how to read more than a few sentences so if that seems like too complex, I can they simplifying it further to make it easier for you.

Too scared to answer, zzzzzzz. You’ll accept it and move on by stopping or eventually blocking me. See as you have to childishly pretend as if you’ve wandered in and don’t even know what the thread is about.

I can remind you of your hot shame. ;>

Which one of the following English sentences would you use to express admiration and adoration of a person?

“[female celebrity] is my heroine!”

OR

“[female celebrity] is my hero!”

See if you use the first one, as your rhetoric implies you want to, and think everyone should participate in this needless gendering, then you’re implicitly saying you don’t understand that saying “x is my heroin” outloud means you’re addicted to something instead of admiring it (and that you don’t understand that “hero” is the colloquially used form).

This is the first time you’ve done this. I’ve done this to hundreds of kids like you. You’ll whine and pretend and lie to yourself, but eventually you’ll accept the massive L you took days ago. When yu’re corrected, you do this exact tantrum you’re pulling, you’re genuinely following the “angry tantrum for sore losers” flowchart to the tee.

Which one of the following English sentences would you use to express admiration and adoration of a person; “[female celebrity] is my heroine!” OR “[female celebrity] is my hero!”? See if you use the first one, as your rhetoric implies you want to, and think everyone should participate in this needless gendering, then you’re implicitly saying you don’t understand that saying “x is my heroin” outloud means you’re addicted to something instead of admiring it (and that you don’t understand that “hero” is the colloquially used form).

“I’m too illiterate to read the things I reply to. This makes me right!”

You’re so scared, you’re trying to lie to yourself you aren’t. But from you obsessing over this thread while running tail tucked from a simple either or question tells everyone your true nature, no matter how hard you try to delude yourself. ;>

You do and you will.

How long do you think you’ll keep up this tantrum before admitting to yourself how childish it is when you lost days ago and now are publicly shaming yourself because you can’t answer a simple question because you’re ashamed of admitting to a mistake.

You won’t get literally anywhere in life like that. So grow a spine and answer or leave. This is just pathetic.

Top-3 easily all dogs.

Then the rest is a few horses, a few birds and maybe one person.

I wouldn’t presume my relationship with cats.

As opposed to a loser who’s so obsessed, he’ll pathetically spam for days variations of “didn’t read”, “lol k” “I don’t even care”

Everyone can see you’re very hurt and thats why you keep coming back. Out of anger. It doesn’t change the fact you can’t even address why you’re in this thread because you’re a coward and can’t stand behind what you said when it was pointed out how silly it was.

<3

Is like to, but I won’t before I’m in a good enough life situation, and either seems improbable or very far away, and while men can definitely have kids to very late in life, I don’t want to wear diapers at the same time as my kids might.

So yeah, mixed feelings.

If I won the lotto right now and found a spouse, sure. Out side from that, nah, prolly not.

I’ve the exact problems with horny girls towards me who just wanted to be friends.

And like, if we’re talking about sex, who do you think it hurts more to straight up say “I don’t want to fuck you”, men or women?

Just like the poster paints men, men are thought of as wanting to have sex with everything two-legged from chickens to ladders.

Nope.

And I’m a rather social dude, and Finns aren’t particularly social to begin with, so I often enjoyed female company more than male if we weren’t actually doing something (driving, playing, shooting) and just sitting and talking.

Because of the way I acted (best not get into that it’d be a novel or five), eventually they went, “uh, guess we’d just best be friends then”, but it took a while for them to get to that point. And when they do, they don’t actually mean it. Many think they do. A couple have. Most have not. Those who only think they mean it or even just say it in a hollow sort of way, they’re basically just saying “oh, well, I guess I should get over you then”.

Like yes, please do, and try to do it in a way that you could still be my friend. But usually it kills… something.

But I can’t straight up tell a girl "I understand you’re into me, but I’m sorry, I’m not into you, can we just be friends?

Even just reading that — no matter if you don’t know what sort of a person I am — you probably thought “what an arrogant dick” It might sound neutral on text, but idk perhaps it’s a language barrier, as that seems polite enough to me now that I write it in English, but it sounds so rude in my accent in Finnish. Or perhaps it’s a localised issue. I haven’t lived abroad unfortunately.

If it’s floating, it has too much fat in it, so it’s not the product of anyone with an especially healthy poop.

Fecal transplants have actually surprising potential.

But yeah there’s a lot of dangerous pathogens as well.

I tried it a fair bit and it seemed to just give vague questions as answers. I wondered why but it was essentially modeled to play a psychiatrist in terms of the sort of language one might use,

So if you write “unhappy” or smth it’ll goe “why are you unhappy” /“did you come to me because you’re unhappy” etc.

Very simple ofc but would’ve been impressive 60y ago.

If you input *help you’ll see commands and *cacm repeats the ELIZA / DOCTOR conversation from the original paper so you can sort of see what it’s capable of when the writer knows pretty much exactly what to prompt. (There’s still some variance in but eh…)

Every time you reply without answering, you’re implicitly admitting you lost, hard.

That’s why you can’t answer the question and just spam childish bs.

Makes you look very credible when you engage in other thread. Oh wait but a tough boy like you won’t care about that, right?

You don’t “care” right? That’s why you can’t let go while being afraid to answer a simple either or.

Depends on whether you subscribe to the many worlds interpretation or not.

If not then you can still time travel as long as it follows the Novikov self-consistency principle

Dude.

First off, it’s purely a hypothetical model. You can plop in negative time to equations and have them make sense, this doesn’t mean that negative time is possible.

However disregarding that. The abstract of the study:

We study the internal dynamics of a hypothetical spaceship traveling on a close timelike curve in an axially symmetric Universe. We choose the curve so that the generator of evolution in proper time is the angular momentum. Using Wigner’s theorem, we prove that the energy levels internal to the spaceship must undergo spontaneous discretization. The level separation turns out to be finely tuned so that, after completing a roundtrip of the curve, all systems are back to their initial state. This implies, for example, that the memories of an observer inside the spaceship are necessarily erased by the end of the journey. More in general, if there is an increase in entropy, a Poincaré cycle will eventually reverse it by the end of the loop, forcing entropy to decrease back to its initial value. We show that such decrease in entropy is in agreement with the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis. The non-existence of time-travel paradoxes follows as a rigorous corollary of our analysis.

So the study the article is based on concludes that time-travel paradoxes are impossible. Thus you can not kill your own grandfather because it’d create a paradox. What they’re saying is that you could be in a CTC (closed time-like curve) where in which time goes back and forth from your grandparents to you and back again, but the time going back would reduced entropy ie reverse things.

So you couldn’t “go back” because that’d mean your entropy ie your arrow of time, was still pointing forwards and not backwards.

This isn’t a case of some random Lemming against a professor saying otherwise. It’s Lemmings telling you you’ve bought into pop-science sensationalism.

The article does actually communicate what I explained there, but really almost hides it with the language, so I’m not surprised your either didn’t read it, missed it, or didn’t internalise it:

Circling back to a spry young grandfather courting your grandmother the first time, the time loop could make his untimely death reversible; your memory of why you ever wanted to murder him in the first place may be erasable. In other words, all bets are off in a closed loop where quantum physics smoothes out any intrusive entropy.

Ie nothing here is breaking the Novikov self-consistency principle

Coolest cat photo I’ve seen in a long while.