No, but I remember them from the '90s.
Agreed completely.
If the gunman was angry about healthcare, there is absolutely no reason that he would go for the children after killing the father.
There’s no logic to it.
I can’t disagree, but it brings a bad taste to the mouth.
Before somebody says that we don’t deserve dogs, please just don’t.
We do deserve them. We basically made them and they love us and we love them.
I appreciate all that, and I very much enjoyed that aquarium myself, but I just can’t approve of keeping large, pelagic animals in captivity unless it’s to try to rehabilitate them. These are animals that travel thousands of miles when they’re out in a natural environment.
Last I read, Trump’s proposal was a 35% tariff on goods from China.
Huh. Never heard of it as an OWI before. DWI, DUI, but this is a first for OWI for me.
Why I’m a utilitarian. Morals need to be a little flexible to be able to account for all situations. I believe in the greater good.
Yeah, but they keep whale sharks in captivity. Whale sharks are too large for that environment.
I just read that it was only half a dozen participants and a couple of dozen observers, but people didn’t exactly have a lot of time to get their outfits ready.
Easy. It makes other powerful people feel uncomfortable that this could happen to one of them.
They know they can get away without justifying this disproportional response.
I think we all know the answer.
Yeah because your average person can afford to sue one of the world’s wealthiest organizations.
Get your head out of your ass.
How horrible, somebody trying to do something positive.
There’s no reason to think that his children would be targeted.
But not the president.