Both. Both are perfectly fine.
Thanks for getting the Word out! Now it finally will pay off, that i got the crew while Ubisoft was giving away games for free a long time ago!
Vive la Resistance! 🇫🇷
Thanks for getting the Word out! Now it finally will pay off, that i got the crew while Ubisoft was giving away games for free a long time ago!
Vive la Resistance! 🇫🇷
Thank you dear person! You truly are a godsend!
Herzlichen Glückwunsch herr Arbeitslos! Sie haben nun den ersten Schritt in eine Bessere Welt gewagt!
A Ducky Momo Fridge!!!
Nenn mich den Schredder! Nieder mit dem Schweinesystem!!!
Peter Arbeitslos! Sie sind es!
WO SIND DIE PRAPSSCHNALLINEN???
The problem is sadly a bit more complicated. Thanks to the winner takes all system over in america a third party candidate has virtually no chance of being elected. Therefore if you want to counter a candidate you disagree with you have to necessarily vote for the most popular candidate that you can mildly agree with.
Some states have signed a pact to switch to ranked choice voting (i think new york and new hampshire are among them) which will help a lot with this problem on a state level. Only when most states adopt this it will matter on a national level.
Then and only then will it be viable to vote third party.
Aha! So this is the famous RadioShack!
I find this very amooseing