If you want privacy and you drive a car, I got bad news for you. Public Transit is privacy.

Emanuel is a veteran Washington insider, having served three Democratic presidents. He holds a reputation as a high-energy political operative who often uses colorful and profane language.

Sounds like the perfect man for the job of ensuring that nothing changes for the better within the DNC.

Withdrawing from NATO, I could see Trump entertaining that (wouldn’t actually happen).

Fire a bunch of the top leadership? For sure. That would both be something Trump could “order the military to do,” as well as something he might do, and it would also harm the US military’s capability to wage war.

Zero out Pentagon funding? Not possible for trump to do alone, but depending on the congressional make up, it could be done and would severely limit the ability of the US Military to wage war. They could even do it without affecting enlisted personnel enrollment. The Pentagon has their own funding 100% separate from military spending.

Could also deny all future discretionary spending for the military/pentagon.

Disband 20% of it’s career leadership.

Zero out pentagon funding.

Withdraw from NATO.

The more cynical among us might view this as a racket. . . Despite his electoral face-plant, he became an influencer touring the country for the Harris campaign. The Texas Democratic Party is replete with “organizers” such as these, who seem always to fail upward.

Oh word?

Replace Jewish with Israeli, or Zionist, and you are 100% accurate about what is happening.

Nah, much like democrats use minorities for their kayfabe social issues, republicans use “family values” or “religion,” the donors, the unelected de-facto party leaders never cared about those things.

The democrats eagerness to support genocide is obvious. Though unfortunately for them, support for genocide isn’t a key differentiator when it comes to winning elections.

It was all Hillary people. Why the DNC keeps hiring hillary and her people? Well Hillary owns the DNC. It’s a private corporation that has private share-holders and their product is ballot access for the Democratic party.

If you want to run as a democrat for almost any office in the entire country you have to go through the DNC.

On the plus side maybe we will start hearing about the horrors at the US Border that magically stopped in november 2020.

We knew that 6 years ago when they continuously floated Harris as the next big thing. She even used the classic hillary policy about “Student loan forgiveness for entrepreneurs who operate a business in a disadvantaged neighborhood for 3 years.”

Harris was Hillary’s next in line before the 2016 election had started.

This isn’t correct political reasoning. Primary voters ARE NOT general voters. As an aside, the primary is just a fiction the major parties use to give their candidates legitmacy. The outcome of a primary doesn’t matter what-so-ever and the candidate could get zero votes from people like me or you and still legally be on the ballot. For example, Harris.

It’s done intentionally. If you want a wired mouse, you can buy one of thousands of wired mice and use those. If you want a wireless mouse, it doesn’t need to and shouldn’t be plugged in while you are using it.

Death to Israel. However Iran is as big a threat to Israel as the average US citizen. They should probably work on reforming their government from a strongman theocracy to something closer to china. Having a “spiritual leader” is alone worthy ridicule, and revoking of international recognition.

I agree. But it’s also not a given that the US despite it’s huge amount of resources, people, historical investment, and fiat currency can only produce 12 missiles a year and that is the hard limit without impossible investment.

Just in time manufacturing addresses warehousing issues, it does not have any affect on maximum capacity. If a machine can produce 1000/widgets an hour, but I can run it for 10minutes a day to produce 167 widgets to meet my line on the demand curve while saving on warehouse costs, then that is what I’m going to do. Additionally I’ll restructure my workers so that instead of needing 100 workers for 8hrs to produce 8000 widgets a day, I’ll simply hire 16 workers ( or more likely 2 workers plus 10 part-time workers) to produce 167 widgets in a day. I don’t spend any time or effort creating a machine that can only run for 10minutes a day and produce only 167 widgets.

The capacity of my widget machine is still 8000/day.

e: Or more likely, I’ll be creating 167 widgets for raytheon at 3x profit, I’ll be creating 20 widgets for north korea at 4x profit, and 4000 widgets for the NCCCP as that is part of their 20 year plan.

For the Stinger, and I’m sure a huge number of other cold-war era military equipment it’s not, and of course that is a systemic problem for the US Military. But the missiles they are launching from destroyers are in active production, so the lack of knowledge problem doesn’t exist there.

Eh. While Capital expenditures can’t be created overnight, these aren’t novel machines they are creating that require exotic materials. The way government bidding works the majority of the components are created across hundreds of sub-contractors and sub-sub-contractors, and they are given a target quota of “100widgets” a year. I doubt that the majority of these sub-contractors only have the capability to create 100widgets year. The limitation is the number of hours they run the factory. Without knowing anything else about the missiles, I bet that production could be doubled by simply using excess factory capacity (i.e. hiring workers for more shifts,) that is simply not done by the capitalists that own the factories, simply because it isn’t profitable to do so.

Obviously at some level of production you run out of machine tool capacity, and at some level beyond that you run out of raw materials, but I doubt we are anywhere near the later and there is a good amount of head room for the former.

The US, despite it’s decline, still has a very large amount of manufacturing capacity and these missiles aren’t using a significant amount of it.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/current/default.htm

An estimated 77% of total US industrial capacity is being utilized.

To be clear, the US could absolutely increase production of missiles, but then the various MIC ghouls would have to hire more workers and that would reduce profit margins. Now while overall profit would increase, the year over year growth of profit would decrease, and that is unacceptable.

Now this is the proper dystopian use of AI I was promised.