they were haranguing you for proof socialism works in the USA. I have the answer
they were haranguing you for proof socialism works in the USA. I have the answer
american socialist enclaves: the swamp maroons, the anabaptists
that’s not funding.
this, too, is not proof, but more rhetoric.
if it were true, you could provide proof, instead of rhetoric.
I seem to recall that the anonymity of car is based on obscuring transactions through bundling, but that method was deanonymized by poisoning wallrts somehow. this was like 10 years ago so my memory is fuzzy.
saying it doesn’t make it true.
no one is torturing animals or paying people to do it.
words do have meanings. what is the opposite of supernatural?
using a byproduct that would otherwise go to waste is good
no one is torturing animals.
it’s a simple question that has nothing to do with me.
if you know a way to raise animals for products at the current scale and price without any pain or discomfort, you should let us know.
I didn’t say he’s off base. I said it’s useless. he’s not actually making a claim that I can use to predict anything.
synthetics are natural. they’re not supernatural.
how many farmers did they ask for their reasons for planting soybeans?
what is the rate at which consolidation if parties occurs? if a fptp system exists with more than two parties, what reason do we have to believe it will consolidate, and when?
I havent changed my position at all. that’s not talking in circles.
I have read plenty, (you didn’t think I was looking all this up just today, did you?) and i have told you a story in which the objective facts are indisputable. the only point of disagreement we have is how to interpret those facts, and I have given actual reasoning for my interpretation, while you said “look it up”.
copying isn’t stealing