“And no you’re not a shit person for critizing any work” is the strawman
“And no you’re not a shit person for critizing any work” is the strawman
I think it makes sense
Contact the admin
vscodium, gedit?
Blocking google would make sense
I couldn’t care less about you giving no shit about being a shit person for shitting on voluntary work. You could just have put the constructive criticism. Putting valid reasons doesn’t justify throwing in an invalid one
Constructive criticism is different than talking shit. Still a useless debate
Nice strawman btw
you can also use GrayJay (discovered it today)
Yes youtube inner api is a public server, even with a domain name, and there’s nothing blocking it, no authentication. Some people say it’s against youtube api ToS but they shouldonly apply to their official api. Now in court you are never sure whay they’ll do
Would be weird if it was right. The youtube inner api doesn’t need an account, it’s the one that generates pages when you search on youtube or start video player
What a useless debate. Anyway they were asking why I was “condescending”, well if you shit on a voluntary work, just because it’s not at your taste, you are a shit person
It’s the cause, not an excuse
pixeldroid is okayish
The whole point of the app is to not have to pay a subscription
Because “overall ugly” is not a constructive comment. They may not like it, that’s okay, not a reason to shit on the app
Yes it does feel a bit incomplete
It is since I criticized only non-constructive criticizing and not critizing in general