• 1 Post
  • 36 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 12th, 2024

help-circle








  • I had never thought about any of this before, but it actually makes perfect sense.

    By its nature, an LLM feeds back some statistically close approximation of what you expect to see, and the more you engage with it (which is to say, the more you refine your prompts for it) the closer it necessarily gets to precisely what you expect to see.

    “He was like, ‘just talk to [ChatGPT]. You’ll see what I’m talking about,’” his wife recalled. “And every time I’m looking at what’s going on the screen, it just sounds like a bunch of affirming, sycophantic bullsh*t.”

    Exactly. To an outside observer, that’s likely what it would look like, because in some sense, that’s exactly what it in fact is.

    But to the person engaging with it, it’s a revelation of the deep, secret, hidden truths that they always sort of suspected lurked at the heart of reality. Never mind that the LLM is just stringing together words and phrases most statistically likely to correspond with the prompts it’s been given - to the person feeding it those prompts, it seems like, at long last, verification of what they’ve always suspected.

    I can totally see how people could get sucked in by that






  • This is a thing I’ve been saying about the Democrats for eight years now, though from a somewhat different angle.

    They’re not only okay with losing elections - in ways they actually prefer it.

    The worst case scenario for Democrats, and if you were paying attention, you saw it when it happened, is controlling both the presidency and a congessional majority. Then they have to go to ludicrous extremes to fail to accomplish anything, including still claiming to be obstructed by the Republican minority, even after spending the last however many years claiming that they couldn’t do anything to stop the Republicsns bevause they were the minority.

    Somehow, the Republicans can stop the Demicrats no matter who has the majority, while the Democrats cannot stop the Republicans, again no matter who has the majority.

    But the key, in my opinion, and not really addressed in this otherwise excellent essay, is that the one and only thing that the Democratic party hierarchy really cares about is keeping the soft money flowing. That’s it - nothing else matters to them.

    And the way they keep the soft money flowing is to provide the appearance of opposition - to play the role of faces against the Republicsn heels - but to never quite manage to stop them, and certainly to never actually accomplish anything even vaguely leftist.

    That provides a dual benefit for them - they keep their corporate sponsors happy by never doing anything that might actually lead to smaller executive pay packages or having to actually pay taxes and they can fundraise among the rank and file with their standard “Look at the horrible things the Republicans are doing and that’s why we need your support!”

    And it all hinges on not successfully opposing the Republicans, and far and away the easiest way to not successfully oppose the Republicans is to lose key elections.




  • Well, first off it can’t bhappen “to Lemmy” because Lemmy isn’t va site - it’s a piece of software.

    It not only can and will but already has happened to individual instances. And they end up getting defederated by other instances and then either fix the problem or fade away.

    And individual users can just move to other instances (or if they’re smart, just stop using or even delete their account on the problem instance and keep using their other accounts on other instances).

    And through it all, the rest of the fediverse just keeps chugging along.

    Which illustrates the key difference between Lemmy/Mbin/Piefed/etc. and traditional social media - the fediverse is flexible. Individual instances can and will and do come and go, and it doesn’t affect the fediverse as a whole.