![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
Least bad faith fascist.
Least bad faith fascist.
I said pumping the breaks
Doesn’t change anything about my point.
There’s still legitimate concern for the removal of Hamas as the acting government of Gaza
Incorrect. And you don’t see the USA sending endless, unconditional, military aid to Palestine so they can remove the Israeli government.
Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu backed Israeli government want a 2 state solution
Hamas explicitly calls for a 2 state solution you lying ghoul.
this remains the US states policy
Not true, not until the US recognises the state of Palestine.
Whoever can broker a deal that affirms a 2 state solution here will hopefully produce meaningful change towards this conflict.
Going to be pretty hard to do while Isreal and the USA are committed to genocide.
And none of the libs have learned a thing. They’re busy gushing over the claim that 90 percent of Russia’s army has been destroyed, and all the previous claims of imminent victory have been memory holed.
because the majority of the United Nations believes Russia is the aggressor.
Source?
Allowing an aggressor to overtake soverign land is a big no-no to the UN.
Lol
The estimates are fairly accurate and have been fact checked by multiple intelligence groups.
You still haven’t been able to back up your claim that the USA is putting the breaks on it’s aid of Isreal because of the genocide. All you’ve done is point to the US going “we’d like it if you slowed down on the genocide, but we’ll 100 support you if you don’t” and tried to equivocate that as being the same, when it really isn’t.
Also Catholicism, especially when it comes to Eru.
The mod log continues to be public.
I hope you die in agony, genocidal monster.
As ever, actual Jewish Holocaust scholars agree with us
Not by “assigning a slightly different definition”, just by applying the definition consistently, rather than using the standard.
But you’re still moving the goal posts. They didn’t post the AP article because it’s a credible source on events in Xinjiang (it isn’t). They posted it to demonstrate that even sources extremely biased against China weren’t going as far as making accusations of killings.
So where does it talk about killings in Xinjiang? Or are you trying to move the goal posts.
If we can’t agree that millions of people in the USSR were killed, sent to gulags, and died of famine during Stalin’s leadership
Can we agree that millions of people in the USA were killed, sent to gulags, and died of famine during FDR’s leadership?
I suspect you don’t think that many people died as a result of the great depression
And do you think that people died during the Holodomor?
Is that from the same anime as your last line?
Like trying to reframe my argument as “rich country good, poor country bad”?
No reframing needed, that was just your argument.
You’ve tried to dismiss my argument by misrepresenting it.
So what exactly is your argument?
This level of insecurity shows how shallow your beliefs are.
Lol, what anime did you crib this line from?
No, it’s that saying one place is worse doesn’t make it so.
Correct, you saying Cuba is worse doesn’t make it so.
Human development index and quality of life studies put the US ahead of Cuba
“Rich country good, poor country bad”
Cuba has better healthcare and lower cost of living, but Americans aren’t on rafts to Cuba.
“Rich country good, poor country bad”
One of the problems with enacting good and lasting change in the western world is that life is pretty darn good on the whole.
Yes, because the West ruthlessly exploits the global south to prop of it’s own standards of living. This is why serious socialist revolutions have mostly only occurred in the Global South.
It could be a lot better, but just shouting that the US is bad is mindless propagada. Be better than that.
Real bad faith framing of your opponents argument there; be better than that.
“I have no argument that you can’t refute, so I’m just going to behave in bad faith”
So once again, your argument is “rich country good, poor country bad”
You’re starting with a conclusion and working backwards.