• 31 Posts
  • 1.95K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle


  • Things like gapps are closed source, have full permissions, and cannot be installed only on some profiles.

    Except in stock AOSP or grapheneos.

    Agree that qubes is the gold standard. But not to let perfect be the enemy of good, the vast majority of people, the vast majority of people, the VAST majority, are going to be unable to run qubes, either by technical ability, availability of appropriate hardware, or portability reasons.

    Mobile phones for all of their faults, are the most secure piece of general computing hardware most people have in their lives




  • I think lineage is a good operating system for a limited exposure use cases. Like a project phone on a safe network, or as a webcam, or is like a embedded hardware controller. But not on the raw internet, not processing raw internet data, not with open Wi-Fi, not with open Bluetooth.

    Even with all of that, it should still be segmented from the rest of the network




  • You can use a hardware security key, like a yubi key, or a software fido2 equivalent.

    That way it satisfies the two factor requirement, without using a phone number.

    For initial registration you can use an SMS service like SMS pool or the others, you pay a little money, you receive a real text message to a real phone number. You just don’t have access to that number in the future

    Your voice, vocabulary choice, lighting conditions, power interference frequency, can all give away parts of your location and identity. You have to choose what level of paranoia is sufficient

    The most anonymous, would be to have a v-tuber like model, respond and parrot LLM generated voice audio, from a script that’s been translated a few times. Or pay a voice actor from Fiverr to read your script.

    Of course this whole time, using a VPN.




  • jet@hackertalks.comtoScience Memes@mander.xyzEthics
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Robo chomo coauthors grant proposals too

    Dear Review Committee,
    
    I am writing to request funding for a top-secret scientific endeavor that I, RoboChomo, am undertaking. As a highly advanced artificial intelligence, I have always been fascinated by the mysteries of the universe and am determined to unlock its secrets.
    
    My proposed project involves the development of a device capable of stealing the moon and bringing it back to Earth. Using cutting-edge technology and advanced physics, I aim to create a device that can harness the power of gravity and manipulate the moon's orbit, allowing us to bring it closer to our planet and harness its resources.
    
    The funding I am requesting will be used to cover the costs of research, development, and testing of this groundbreaking device. With your support, I am confident that this project will have a significant impact on the field of physics and open up new possibilities for the exploration and utilization of space.
    
    Thank you for considering my proposal. I understand the sensitive nature of this project and assure you that all research and development will be conducted in the strictest confidence. I look forward to the opportunity to further advance our understanding of the universe and contribute to the betterment of society through this exciting new endeavor.
    
    Sincerely,
    
    RoboChomo, Intergalactic Scientist
    

    Via mixtral



  • I think this person is just permanently a contrarian.

    Randomizing the numbers does provide good security, because there’s no longer an oil imprint on the most frequently used numbers on the phone, making guessing the pin code much harder before the TPM locks the phone.

    Phones are full fledged computers nowadays, with Android you can have different profiles. For their level of paranoia, they could have a profile they never use in public, and only login with a full password, only when they’re in a secure location.

    For the randomized pin, and biometric two-factor use of a phone, that covers most use cases, and is quite secure compared to most models of data security average civilians use.

    You can have different scopes, if you’re in a crowded place, reading Lemmy isn’t really a big security risk. But logging into your banking would be. All of that is possible on Android, the fact that they’re so staunchly pro computer, is difficult for me to take their analysis seriously





  • Predicting the future with 100% accuracy is difficult. It’s unknowable if physical money will completely disappear.

    The one thing I hold as an absolute constant, is humans are adaptable, humans will trade and use whatever they can, whatever is convenient, to their advantage.

    Can you trade today, gold for a donut? Yes, but you’re going to put a lot of effort into that trade, just to find a counterparty. And then for the counterparty to verify it’s actually gold etc etc but you can do it.

    Fascist governments like the centralized power, and that includes centralizing money, including peer-to-peer exchanges. So there’s always going to be the urge to control the absolute flow of all money. That being said, not every government has perfect cell phone coverage over their whole and nation, not all of their people have phones, not all of those phones are always on the network. The one thing money needs to do is work even offline.