Just cos meta supports it doesnt mean its bad. The enemy of my enemy etc etc

Rebuilding from the ashes hey? Isnt that what the communists and the techbros want?

I find it ironic that we started with government havih a stranglhold of mainstream media propagandising everyone and now that we have the internet any anyone can run their propaganda (equallity of free speach) suddenly we now have to worry about propaganda.

Isnt the whole point that in the marketplace of ideas the best ones continue and the worste ones die? Is that not exactly what a platform like lemmy is?

Who decides what is misinformation? The government who is in power and has a vested interest in maintaining power?

Yeah but the former makes the latter easyer. Nuclear power also provides justification for enrichment especially considering we sit on one of the worlds largest uranium deposits

The political spectrum is topologicaly a torus

U guys need mandatory voting like what we got here in aus. And by mandatory it doesnt mean u have to pick someone (its ur right to spoil ur ballot) it simply means u have to attend a polling booth.

Voting is a duty not a right

It’s not a solution for addressing the climate crisis, any attempt to market it as such is disingenuous. It could have been but it’s 20 years too late.

Why cant it help address the issue now? Solar and wind are great but they eaither require large expensive batteris to handle the inconsistent nature or other on demand power geberation methods to fill the gaps (hydroelectric, gas, etc). Most energy on the grid comes from coal which has large lead times with very efficient reliable generation providing a good base power generation. We can replace a vast majority of the non renewable energy with wind + solar + batteries + hydroelectric but this cannot provide the nonfluctuating base generation thats filled by coal atm. Nuclear is a drop in replacment for coal in its generation charecteristics. Nuclear is ideal for long nonfluctuating loads which are increasing a lot with the likes of ai, datacentres, crypto etc, these use cases are increasing and will continue to do so thus increasing the base power load (the ideal for nuclear).

It certainly can be a part of a long term energy plan and even a long term military plan, but it’s not going to be providing energy in 10 years. The only things that are going to achieve that are wind and solar with energy storage.

Exactly and my logic based on past experience is that the government isnt going to make that change they are just gonna keep using coal. If the nuclear gets off the ground then we can replace old coal with new nuclear thus giving ample capacity for the big businesses to adapt without the same level of backlash. Its about alligning profit incentives.

Also Ukraine has had nuclear plants since the Soviet era. Do you mean under under America’s nuclear weapon umbrella? Nuclear weapons development is significantly different from power generation.

I mean america Britain and russia convinced ukraine to give up their nukes in exchange for security guarantees (weve seen how thats going) this significantly undermines the global trust is americas nuclear umbrella agreements theyve made hence rhe global rush by many nations to buold nukes.

Going from nuclear power to nuclear bombs is a lot easyer than anyone is comfortable to admit. If we can get on the nuclear power path then that makes a potential transition to nuclear bombs easyer. Not that we will do that but the capacity for us to do so changes the military calculus for our enemies and more importantly for our allies.

Hows the echo chamber? Dont challenge ur own beliefs. Btw why u need to announce that ur blocking me?

U want me banned lol. Unban tldr bot and i wont have to get lemmings to do the job for me.

For heigh gpu tasks u can passthrough the gpu itself. So inference gaming etc it has same capability as any other os.

Ths best time to plant a tree is 50 years ago. The second best time is now. Same logic applies. Also ukraine has proven Americas nuclear umbrella isnt particularly reliable so oyr own nuclear technology might be nessasary in future.

Are u saying quoting someone who committed violence is a threat of violence? What if i where to say liberty, equality, fraternity is that a threat of guillotine?

It really isnt that slow virtualization overhead is pretty minimal nowdays.

What about free speach?

Nuclear is our best how for clean energy.

Qubes is the actuall security distro tho.

Ik people hate crypto and thats valid but monero is an objectivly better way to tranfer value than fiat currency.

Federation is literaly web3 philosophy. Fiat will destroy the decentralisation we have tryed so hard to create.

No i literally wanted the answer and tldr bot was banned. Gonna use the rest of the lemmy users now.

Thx auto tldr bot

Why? Who?