Also keep this in mind as legacy media continues to try their best to make Trump seem reasonable, they are owned by a few billionaires who have a rational, material interest in Trump getting reelected no matter what that means for everyone else.
NGL if HBO made this into a 6 part miniseries I would watch. I would hate myself as I watched but I would watch.
They’re not so much in the pockets of big oil so much as they literally are big oil. At least a part of it.
These degenerates are also completely incapable of choosing someone who would be benevolent even for a moment. They just want someone who hates the same people they hate to be able to bypass checks and balances to hurt the people they want to hurt. There’s no deeper political philosophy here.
It’s Trump’s schtick. He spews out a constant stream of nonsense. His supporters are conditioned to ignore it.
Which significant Democrat has proposed any of that? What makes anything you said relevant?
No they won’t because Louisiana will vote GOP no matter what and they know it .
His health suggests that won’t be necessary. If they 25th him they’ll have to deal with his angry cult. The one thing Trump will reliably do is whatever he can to make rich people richer. There’s no need to off him. His ridiculous antics provide great cover for all the evil shit these people do in the background with Trump eating up all the media coverage.
sir this is a Wendy’s drive though
Isn’t that allergy medicine and an antihistamine? How does that keep you going?
No one knows what you’re talking about.
My government provides more aid to foreign citizens than they do to canadians
Want to explain? Or should I just take your word for it?
I don’t think that applies in a broad sense if you include fish , but everything I know about bear meat says that you have to cook the shit out of it specifically to kill the many parasites that the bear’a immune system keeps at bay (but doesn’t completely destroy) while it’s alive. Eating rare bear meat is incredibly stupid.
This isn’t difficult to grasp. Israel has the right to go to war against its enemies, and children die in war.
Really? Does every country have this “right”? Or just Israel? Cause it sounds to me like you granted all of Israel’s enemies the right to go to war against Israel.
But the responsibility for those deaths lies with the people who started the war - especially since they started it knowing full well that large numbers of Palestinians would die in the process. They want those deaths.
The responsibility of the consequences of a bullet being fired or a bomb being dropped rests with the person who pulls the trigger. This is true even when those actions are justified. Israel still has agency, and therefore moral responsibility. Nothing you said even brings to refute this.
Honestly, you’re just incredibly naive about this. It’s frightening that so many people are so blinded by their hate that they have come to see barbaric terrorists and radical Islamists as the good guys.
I have not said or implied this. You’re setting up a strawman because you have no real argument.
Your moral compass is just so messed up.
Says the guy trying so hard to justify the murder of children lol. Just a few thousand more bruh, that’ll make Israel safe.
Oh, and don’t lecture me on what Zionism is. It’s our movement. We defined it.
Your movement is defined not by your words by the actions taken in its name. The moral bankruptcy of those actions speaks for itself .
A definition by which most humans that have ever existed have been slaves.
I mean you can sort of give him a pass on that. The Enterprise D is far more luxurious than any cruise ship of his time and in a completely different realm to any military ship in terms of material comforts.
It’s dated, and ancient compared to the shit we spew, but it soo pure and clear (when you get the ear for it).
I am not a scholar, I can’t analyse prose or poetry, but his writing is cleansing and lights up the brain - especially if you have a fetish for reasonableness.
I know exactly what you mean and I’ve never quite had the words to describe this type of writing. It’s definitely old fashioned to our eyes, but it’s so dense with meaning. I felt the same reading some of the landmark SCOTUS decisions of the Warren court during the civil rights era.
Spoken like a person who had no idea what slavery is .
The types of people that offer their political opinions online are not themselves representative of the whole voting public. This would introduce an instance of sampling bias.