Look I just don’t want Xdefiant to die.

If a community was fighting over something so trivial like this I’d consider leaving the game entirely.

You don’t know what a circular argument is 🤦🏾‍♂️

You’re saying he couldn’t be elected, despite his massive popularity, because he’s a socialist?

Who says he’s that popular outside of the Democratic party?

If Bernie was the candidate in 2016, or even 2024, I in my heart truly believe he would have won.

Aww, that’s cute. Who cares? 😂

The man is a Socialist, and most people are afraid of Socialism. Things would need to get really really bad in America for Americans to want such drastic change.

The tough thing is he would never have won a general election, and the Democrat party knew it. That’s part of why they shafted him. They still shouldn’t have done that though.

This time it’s real? You promise?

Over time people stop believing that there’s a wolf though. That’s literally what the article is about.

We haven’t held the House yet, calm down

I wonder what the left wing response to this story will be. Seems like everyone loved P’nut.

I do actually see the arguments for taking him, especially since the legal papers required for ownership weren’t completely filed yet, but I can’t imagine what reasoning could be used to kill P’nut.

The comment section here is mad, which I guess means the research was right.

Lentils are fire. Ramen isn’t bad either. If you like fruit, you can buy them in small portions and bring them home to eat each day.

I feel like the Squad not growing in the past several years and then losing one of its members in a recent state election proved that it’s already dead.

It actually shows how irrelevant and unpopular the far left is IRL. The way you’d hear people on places like Lemmy talk, you’d think progressivism represents at least like 65% of left wing ideology.

Interesting, that’s what a lot of poll-based maps and predictions are showing like RCP’s electoral college no tossups map

And?

After all this, you’re not able to identify how this is supposed to be ragebait. Amazing.

I’m not going to go back and forth with you on this, this is a really silly objection here. I shared it because it’s funny on multiple fronts. Like, making a gun-free map in a shooting game is funny, as is making such a map to promote your campaign when you own guns yourself AND during your campaign you publicly stated that you’re not trying to take peoples’ guns away! 😂😂

Maybe you thought that was supposed to make people mad for some reason? But sorry to disappoint ya bud, this is just funny.

This election is gonna be a weird one. Whoever wins will get at least 310 electoral college votes IMHO, but with narrow leads in those battleground states. So things on the electoral map will look way more lopsided than they should.

Literally just told you again the second sentence. A sentence beginning “the rage-bait is.”

Seriously? Your sentence was this:

The rage-bait is getting to say ‘she took away our guns!’ In a video game.

There’s nothing about “she took away our guns in a videogame” that should incite rage or anger…right? Like, what would be the concern exactly? Kamala banning shooting games?

Or maybe I’m missing something. Why would “she took away our guns in a videogame” rile people up? What would they be riled up about, exactly? Guns going missing in a videogame?

That’s a whole lot of words to say “I know you asked how this is ragebait, I just don’t have an answer for you since there’s nothing in this article indicating or encouraging outrage. Sorry!”

Yeah that’s what I thought lol

So, again, what about this article insinuates that people should be angry about this Fortnite map?