Found while doing forensics on some rediscovered loose flash drives.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s from the beginning meant to be fully scripted though. You’re not supposed to be putting in these commands manually, it’s meant to be used in an environment where the 5-50 commands you or your company needs constantly have aliases and script files defined and on PATH.

      • skilltheamps@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, if it was as object based as it claims, Get-WmiObject would subtract WmiObject from Get. Instead it is like having all the clutchy drawbacks from being object based without reaping any of the potential bemefits.

        If you want anything that actually is object based, just use xon.sh - sane and familiar syntax with insane amounts of power just like that

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Get-Disk would have sufficed here, no real need to use WMI here. That said, you would still need to filter USB device and select properties you want to retrieve.

      And unrelated, but if WMI class needs to be queried, Get-CimInstance is the preferred method instead of Get-WmiObject for quite some time.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Text Based OS > Object Based OS

      Everything that is wrong with PowerShell in my opinion is driven by the Object Oriented nature of Windows as an OS.

      Since everything in Linux is text, grep is king.

      • skilltheamps@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Also lots of command line tools have a flag to output json, and then you can do everything powershell can

      • bleistift2@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Don’t you think immediately getting the property you’re interested in from an object is easier and more readable than first grepping some output to get the line you want and then removing the leading and trailing garbage on that line manually?

        I thing PS scripting would be much more fun if the words weren’t so annoyingly long.

        • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          first grepping some output to get the line you want and then removing the leading and trailing garbage on that line manually

          That’s not what we do, though. Give me a more concrete example, and I’ll let you know how I would expect to do it in a nix environment. I’d be curious to compare. Since I have zero experience with powershell, I am not really sure what to expect. The couple times I’ve glanced at a powershell script it looked awful, but I could be falling into Paul Graham’s blub paradox there. OK, I don’t think so, but maybe.

          • bleistift2@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            For instance: Get the temperature of the “Composite” sensor from this output:

            $ sensors
            k10temp-pci-00c3
            Adapter: PCI adapter
            Tctl:         +37.1°C  
            
            BAT1-acpi-0
            Adapter: ACPI interface
            in0:          16.07 V  
            curr1:         1.80 A  
            
            amdgpu-pci-0500
            Adapter: PCI adapter
            vddgfx:        1.46 V  
            vddnb:       918.00 mV 
            edge:         +35.0°C  
            slowPPT:     1000.00 uW 
            
            nvme-pci-0200
            Adapter: PCI adapter
            Composite:    +28.9°C  (low  =  -5.2°C, high = +79.8°C)
                                   (crit = +84.8°C)
            
            acpitz-acpi-0
            Adapter: ACPI interface
            temp1:        +37.0°C  (crit = +120.0°C)
            

            Without a cryptic awk incantation that only wizards can understand, that would be:

            sensors | grep Composite | grep -Po 'Composite:.*?C' | grep -Eo '[[:digit:]]{1,2}\.[[:digit:]]'

            • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              I think I misunderstood you, when you said “manually”, to mean as a human intervention in the process. What you’re showing here is an extra processing step, but I wouldn’t call that manual. Just want to clear that up, but I’m still down to play.

              Instead of three greps, you could use one sed or awk. I don’t think there’s anything particularly wizardly about awk, and it would be a lot less cryptic, to me, than this chain of greps.

              But a much better idea would be to use sensors -j to get json output, intended for machine reading, and pass that to jq. Since I don’t have the same sensors output as you, I’m not sure exactly what that would be, but I am guessing probably something like:

              sensors -j | jq '."nvme-pci-0200".Composite.composite_input'
              

              I look forward to seeing how you would do this in PS. As I said previously, I don’t know it at all, so I’m not sure what you’re comparing this to.

              • bleistift2@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                What you’re showing here is an extra processing step, but I wouldn’t call that manual.

                Yes, it’s not manual by the dictionary definition, but it is an extra step. This is another meaning of manual in my particular bubble [Edit: that I didn’t think to specify].

                But a much better idea would be to use sensors -j to get json output, intended for machine reading, and pass that to jq.

                This is my initial point, exactly. Dealing with objects is way easier than using the ‘default’ line-wise processing. Only Powershell made that the default, while in Linux you need to hope that utilities have an option to toggle it on – and then also have jq installed to process the objects.

                I look forward to seeing how you would do this in PS. As I said previously, I don’t know it at all, so I’m not sure what you’re comparing this to.

                [Edit, since I forgot to answer your main point:] I don’t program in PS. I don’t like the verbosity. But I do think MS has a point in pushing objects as the prime unit in processing instead of lines.

    • catsup@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      OP was trying to get the information for a hard disk in their computer, but after running a command it looks like the serial number for that disk is 💙B

    • icanwatermyplants@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The humor is in the amount of hoops to jump through to get some basic info out using Powershell. Under Linux one would use a single command or just check what the system exposes in the form of a file.

      I have no idea how to do forensics under Windows to be honest. You’d probably have to write something to get to the block layer so it can be dumped and analyzed. Perhaps OP can amuse us how he went about it.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s just one command with a bunch of selects, you could probably just run the first part. I can try it myself later.

        There are a lot of software that forensics can use, I don’t know how common windows is but considering its usage for everything else in companies and governments, I wouldn’t be surprised if forensics use primarily Windows.

  • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Microsoft products in this area are weird to me. Like C#, Powershell is great on one hand yet annoying and more difficult to rangle on the other compared to other solutions that are out there.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      At least it’s more readable than Bash.

      Although that’s not much of an accomplishment.