Summary
JD Vance argued that courts cannot overrule Trump’s executive orders, likening judicial interference to an illegal overreach.
Critics, including lawmakers and legal experts, denounced his claims as unconstitutional.
This debate follows recent federal rulings blocking Trump’s executive actions, including spending freezes and an order ending birthright citizenship.
Opposition figures warned against undermining the judiciary, emphasizing checks and balances.
No, couch boy, that is how it works… A president can’t just do whatever he wants and we all just have to be fine with it. There are still rules. What you’re talking about is the supreme leadership of a dictator. Kindly take your fascist fuckery and shove it up your ass with the rest of Trump’s dick.
well, if the founding fathers didn’t want the president total power and act like a king, they should have named it something different than king and divide the power in multiples branches
Something something “official acts”.
There’s a difference between “can’t be overruled by the Judiciary” and “can’t be arrested for trying.”