House Democratic lawmakers reportedly used a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups that have been driving constituent calls and pressuring the party to act like a genuine opposition force in the face of the Trump administration’s authoritarian assault on federal agencies and key programs.

  • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    The problem is you get the NDP/Liberal vs. Conservative effect when you do this. If you have 30% of the population vote for your Leftie, and 30% vote for the other Leftie, in a given congressional district, the Republican can win with 31%, despite 60% voting against the Republican. We need RCV before we can do this, and people need to understand that they MUST put the other party as choice 2 or we are back to ending up with a Republican.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 days ago

      This is why a new party needs to be built from the ground up, starting with local races that are uncontested or use ranked choice voting already.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 days ago

      If Democrats are so scared of splitting the vote, they don’t need to run a candidate. It’s not like they’re particularly interested in winning anyway.

    • ofcourse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      That is indeed a problem that needs to be resolved, and likely through ranked choice voting. But as a country, we tend to focus too much on the presidential election. Change will have to start in the congressional elections - both at federal and state levels. The issue of votes splitting will be a lesser issue in these elections except in a few large districts. That will also be where smaller fundraising campaigns would go further.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 days ago

      The thing you’re missing is that you’ll tap into a whole new category of voters that have never had anyone to vote for before.

      • sakodak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 days ago

        Ding. Both major parties have abandoned the working class, and a whole lot of people have given up on the system as a whole. Give a real choice that has a chance and people will turn up. But that means the politics-as-sports folks need to hang up their team colors, and that’s only going to happen by spreading class consciousness. No war but class war.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I fail to see your point. That sounds like you have a 61 majority for the Republicans. The “Liberals” are aiding the Republicans getting power, as the article points out.

      Also the Democrats are a pink washed far right party, by standards outsidr the US.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      They just need to put the Trump party last (or whatever the shittiest party is at the time)… They can put anyone they want 2nd