cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/29712953
The Philippine Coast Guard condemned “dangerous” manoeuvres by a Chinese Navy helicopter Tuesday as it flew within three metres (10 feet) of a surveillance flight carrying a group of journalists over the contested Scarborough Shoal.
An AFP photographer on the flight described seeing the helicopter tail the plane before drawing near the left wing, close enough to see personnel aboard filming them.
The helicopter had been “as close as three metres” to the fisheries bureau aircraft, the coast guard said in a statement. The plane had been flying about 213 metres above the water on a mission to observe Chinese vessels in the area.
“Around 0839 hours, a People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLA-Navy) helicopter … performed dangerous flight maneuvers towards the BFAR aircraft. This reckless action posed a serious risk to the safety of the pilots and passengers during the MDA flight,” the coast guard statement said.
The Scarborough Shoal – a triangular chain of reefs and rocks in the South China Sea – has been a flashpoint between the countries since China seized it from the Philippines in 2012.
…
In December, the Philippines said the Chinese coast guard fired water cannon and “sideswiped” a government fisheries department vessel.
Manila released a video appearing to show a Chinese coast guard ship firing a torrent of water at the BRP Datu Pagbuaya.
Other footage apparently taken from the Philippine ship showed its crew shouting “Collision! Collision!” as the much larger Chinese vessel nears its right-hand side before crashing into it.
…
My headline read:
Philippine Coast Guard Slams ‘Dangerous’ China Helicopter
Manoeuvres
I’m guessing that was by design as it’s not the original headline?
Not sure if I understand you right, but unless they do some A/B testing my headline above is the original one. I didn’t edit.
They must’ve A/B’d it. Other version says “condemned”
Unfortunately it reads ‘Slams’ in a few different browsers from multiple locations…
Be really nice if it went the other way ‘Slams’ to ‘Condemned’. Like some editor said ‘Slams makes you sound like an a bandwagon jumping imbecile, do you think there’s another word you could use’. ‘Thanks bro, your comment is really a gamechanger for me, how bout condemned?’
What other version?
It’s gone now; when I first loaded the article it said Condemned. Now it says Slammed everywhere.
Could be, I read ‘slams’, but it’s not much difference anyway :-)