I disagree with Haz on a lot of things, but Haz’s statement that revolutionary warfare is more than a mere “class war” within a vacuum and also has national-liberation aspects due to the globalistic nature of imperialism is pretty valid

  • redshiftedbrazilian@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think his criticism towards Hakim and Luna are wrong, specially that horrible and ahistorical comparision between modern Russia and North Vietnam.

    He does have some valid points but the amount of bad takes in this text is astonishing. Every good think he says has been said better by other texts that do not have reactionary worldview regarding minorities rights or uncritical support for Putin. I think I never read or interacted with PatSocs in a meaningful way before reading this and I honestly wish I never did.

    • ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lol his criticism of Luna Oi is ridiculous, she has issues with American patriotism (huh I wonder why? She’s from America right? Oh wait a sec? Oh she’s from Vietnam, the country that the US bombed more than all the bombs in WW2 dropped combined)no shit she’s against US patriotism, she also gives analysis past that obvious point but Haz and Maupin ignore these and say she’s wrong

      • redshiftedbrazilian@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        He has an entire text dedicated to “exposing” Luna, its pathetic and very dishonest.

        Not only that but an american man arguing with a vietnamese woman if its okay or not to appeal to america’s racist and chauvinist patriotism for a revolution is just next level ironic. Mf is completely disconected from reality