and you are just telling me this now? after I ran the trains so well for you?
and you are just telling me this now? after I ran the trains so well for you?
Wait tiktok does a photo galary?
You too Oppo
Why does a person need to prove they are a person? I mean I get someone can be a bad person, can be an evil person, but note we are still saying they are a person, there person hood is not in doubt. so why is it that we are making people prove they are people, and why are we doing this on a state by state basis?
fascists of course aren’t people and cannot be treated like they’re people
This is a super dangeorus line of thinking, they ARE people, no diffrent than you and I, and they have chosen or been coerced to choose this, and honestly that is a scarier though. They are not dumber than us, they are not less capable of making rational decisions than us, because we are made of the same stuff, our thoughts are both just electircal impulses through the brain. Our choices are we can discard them as “not people” stop trying to understand what drove them to make the choices they made, and how to counter that naritive, how to teach and convence them to come over. OR we can understand they are people who made this choice for a reason, and vary rarely do they choose it because they woke up and decided to be cartoonishly evil, we need to understand what has caused this. Now will we be able to get them all, no the leadership are criminals and should be treated as such, but not every person is unreachable. We get no where when we start discounting people as not people.
Why is people in quote marks?
Except the Genocide went from mostly quiet, to very loud and explicit. While there has been a genocide agianst Palistinians for quite a wile now, this is the first time in a long time that it has hit the news cycle, or even been this undeniable, so it would make sense that a party that pretends to be lesser evilism, but is letting a genocide accelerate is not going to be able to retain votes.
I am sorry I do not know what you mean can you elaborate please?
wait so communism is free electricity or no electricity?
the only way that you could possibly view the dems as center left is if you are looking at them through the overton window of the United States, where all talk and view is shifted so far to the right it is not even funny. You might not know what it is or that it exists but you are influenced by it.
So the question is, are they a marxist who is so locked into the US overton window that they think the dems are something they are not, or are they lieing about something.
I am not sure what you are refering to in my statement of “it does not” Are you refering to the general marxist consnious that the US Dems are quite far right? are you replying to the claim that both parties could be discribed as Fascist, or is it that I said in general left only starts when a party is not controled by the owning class?
It is generaly not marxist because it relies on the US overton window, a window we know to be HENIOUSLY to the right to the point where it can be argued both parties are Fascist. Generaly when a marxist left only starts to have meaning when you are not controlled by the Owning class.
Yes tell me more about this Danish person
Apolitical is not a real thing, there can be politicaly nutral where a space does not care about polotics, or there can be a space without politics as the main focus, but there cannot be a space devoid of politics. What most apolitical spaces become is liberal to some kind because that is the background of society, and that would not be a welcome place. As for places without polotics as a driving force we have a few, I think most notably is birds, however we also have a mostly dead one I run about the show Futurama, so they exist but they are distictly not apolitical.
You cannot do this too me you cannot make me touc… wait its over? And I missed a chance to compain, darn
they have a good chance in my opinion in 2028, especialy because the GOP will not be able to fix any of the economy
What next I thought capitalism was suposed to inharently care about the little guy /s
This is the least depressing Democratic autopsy I have heard
And the libs wonder why we could not in good faith vote for Harris
But hear me out… no, I will not, out of pure stuborn spite