Do you think an European Citizens’ Initiative to ban Twitter in the EU would be beneficial and have a possibility of being successful?

I’m sorry if this is not a good community for this question. If not please point me to one.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Twitter actively pushes some content and hides others.
    So it’s controlling what people see with an editorial decision.
    The fact that this decision is made by an algorithm is entirely irrelevant.
    Therefore Twitter should be fully responsible for any harm caused by what it publishes, and any illegal content.
    They can’t claim to be just a platform as long as their algorithm controls what people get to see.

    If the EU enforced this, there would be no need to ban Twitter.

  • dergewerkschafter@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Twitter isnt a social media plattform anymore. Its like truth social a plattform for propaganda. And as we do boycott, bann and so on russian and chinese propaganda, we should ban us propaganda too. I think ith that easy. (:

  • cherrari@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The main issue with Twitter is that we will never be able to prove that the algorithms are not manipulating users by shaping a certain narrative. Combine this with the unsettling events of recent months and I feel like we have no other choice than banning this platform in the free world.

      • cherrari@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        This is not about disagreement but the total lack of transparency and control over potentially hostile and destructive narratives. Right now, what Elon pushes on twitter is borderline hate speech, corruption and fake news. And hate speech is illegal in many countries. It‘s exactly the same situation as with TikTok and USA, who are still likely to ban TikTok. Also, I don’t think Twitter should be banned on the internet level like what China is doing. But as a European I should be able to disable all algorithms and other content manipulation methods when using the service.

  • adm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I worry that these actions of banning platforms with ultimately break global awareness. We still have things like bluesky but Twitter was the platform for awhile. As the US slowly alienates and isolates itself from the rest if the world well find ourself ultimately less informed. Granted, Twitter is now a cesspool but generally I don’t like seeing our information channels close.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m an American so maybe the rest of you won’t agree with me, but I think the idea is great. We should also ban it here in the US, in Australia, and Mexico, and Canada and, really, the whole world.

  • Nukul4r@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not a fan of banning sites. This establishes infrastructure, which a future fascist regime could use for their purposes. Better to strengthen local alternatives and let it happen by itself.

    • rippersnapper@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Exactly, govt representatives, journalists and newspapers should at the very least start using alternatives like Mastodon and Bluesky. Let Twitter wither away by itself after that.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      what about restricting use by governments?

      people should make choices, governments should be sovereign in as many ways as possible imo… twitter has proven that it’s not an unbiased utility

      or perhaps the “primary source of truth” must be elsewhere and may be shared to twitter, but governments must do whatever they can to ensure that citizens primary method of interaction is through sovereign sources - which may mean limited posting to twitter/meta etc, or it may mean marketing

  • nuko147@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t like the idea of banning social media, newspapers, books, or news websites. Even if they go downhill like twitter. Just opting out and ignoring them, will do. If many do it, it will collapse by itself. But there must be a good alternative and that is difficult.

      • nuko147@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, all politicians in Europe should abandon twitter. And surely all official offices. Many replacing it with bluesky, witch is a wrong move.

        Instead of leading the people to an open source and maybe not profit focused platform, they just follow the mass.

  • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    This was the moment where banning twitter turned from a good idea into a non negotiable measure we need to take asap.

  • arifinhiding@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    If the ban brings a new alternative in place, then yes. I’m not from the EU or the USA, but I’m used to Mastodon and Lemmy. I don’t mind non-american alternatives. The EU should have its own competitive social media for the rest of the world.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      this has been done in a few countries but running a government mastodon instance and giving departments and official accounts profiles… i kinda love that, but wish mastodon supported domains like bsky does

      id love to have like [email protected], [email protected], etc but afaik the way mastodon works is you need to devote an entire domain to it, so they’d have to be like [email protected], which is kinda verbose :(

      • arifinhiding@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unfortunately, as I understand it, Bluesky has an identical algorithm with Twitter. Ive lost patience with how American-led technology has taken the world’s attention for granted. What I had when I was on Bluesky was reading the same information being viraled and repeated, and the same prominent users from Twitter absorbing almost all of my attention. Bluesky promoting the same users since 2010 made the world smaller for me and I’d rather be on Mastodon where smaller creators are somewhat boosted. Moreover, spaces on Lemmy are teaching me a lot about the European Union, and since I’m an outsider and I don’t live in the west, I deeply enjoy being educated rather than sensationalized with the same conspiracy theory. I firmly believe there’s a larger world than what an American-led algorithm often portrays. But, I acknowledge that everyone is different and I understand that they might still have preferences that are different to mine. Nonetheless, I still want an algorithm that actually shows me niche topics all around the world.

        • tfm@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The cool thing on bluesky is that you can create your own algorithms through custom feeds. Also to my knowledge the following feed is purely chronological.

          It’s surely not as decentralized and free as Mastodon but it’s heck of a lot better than the centralized platforms.

          • iamkindasomeone@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Is there something against an approach where we only store data, like we did for the last centuries. But how the data is aggregated and presented is not defined. There could be various frontends using different (public) algorithms. This could work pretty easy with decentralised networks like the fediverse.

            • tfm@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Isn’t that exactly the way Bluesky/ATprotocol works? You can store your account/data wherever your want (PDS) and the Relays/Firehorses are responsible to aggregate posts.

              I also like ActivityPub more but Bluesky is definitely easier to use.

  • Tw4tnoM0r3@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    We should ban it for politicians. Why on earth would you use a for-profit foreign platform for official communication?

    • iwasnormalonce@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wrote to my MP asking them to stop using it and to help to get other MPs off the platform. Everyone should write to their representativea in government asking them to do the same.

  • NotLemming@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think companies etc should be banned from sharing news and updates there. Eg. A lot of public transport news is shared there, sometimes exclusively. It would be ideal if people could get access but nothing official or important was facilitated. Imagine if we were having to access truth social to find out if public transport was cancelled due to a snowstorm - well, now xitter is truth social.

  • paolo3000@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d be in favour of this. I think we’ve seen how fickle the masses are. They need to be shielded from the fake, toxic shit that is social media

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Depends what “ban” means. If it refers to them not being able to be commercially active in the EU because they violate EU regulations, sure. So no selling ads, no targeting ads, no selling blue check-marks.

    If it refers to preventing people from the EU to access their website through meddling with DNS or similar means, then i am against it. We should be able to access it, but they shouldnt be able to make money off it in the EU.

    • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I do agree.

      Some people might need access to those sites for various reasons (journalists making research, keeping in contact with friends overseas, etc.). But we ought to inform the european population about the dangers of using those services, and preferably move politics and country-specific communication (your local police station social media account) onto european solutions.

      Cutting off or limiting the profits which american megacorps can make off the european population does also sound like a good idea.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    X does not and will not comply with EU rules, and thus needs to be banned until they change (i.e. indefinitely).

    • vrojak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am also fine with escalating fines until the problems are addressed. Say, start with 1000$ and double that every week until they comply, either they do or there’ll be a lot of money.