• WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Idk why you’re being downvoted. They did, and you’re right. A door of that size made with accurate wood could hold two adult men out of the water when they removed their life vests and put them under the door.

        If Jack and Rose had done the same, they would have increased the chance of survival for both of them by both being out of the water and having double the body heat to warm each other.

        • Grellan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because you missed in the same episode during that part where David Cameron said that Leo’s character dying was what had to happen. That was the story. It is a pointless gotcha, based on the movie not spending the time to determine the exact amount of buoyancy of a ship wreck.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            They have straps to tie them on you. You tie them together and hold them under the door. Or use any of the other crap floating in the ocean. Literally anything could be held in a shirt or pants. You can inflate your pants themselves by tying the legs together and blowing air into the waistband.

            • NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I imagine it would be quite difficult to tie knots with frozen limbs and fingers, in the dark. And trying to get a second person on the door would have required the already freezing girl to dip into the water. I can see why they wouldn’t try it.

        • ShustOne@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          They try in the movie and it causes them both to be in the freezing water. It wasn’t about him being able to float, it was about them both not freezing to death.

        • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          yeah because being in the open ocean in subzero temperatures is the moment that one will think “sure, better take my life vest off and strap it on this fucking door. I bet it will hold the door afloat and I will always be attached to this door. What can go wrong?”

  • ShustOne@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    She was involved in a major historical event where the person she thought she’d be with forever died right in front of her.

    Also she’s telling the story of the Titanic to people who asked her to tell the story about her time on the Titanic. Why would her kids or family be relevant? This is just rage bait.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Even besides all that, why does any of this reflect on other women? incel ass shit

      Edit: judging by the voting, a bunch of incels found this thread

      • Bayz0r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think the post is dumb but the logic is that it reflects on other women because millions of them think it’s a good love story (as per the post).

        • eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Except, this logic falls apart immediately when you start understanding that she was in love with the dude and he died trying to save her. That’s something you remember your whole life. This is just a bad unhealthy take from OP and the downvoters here.

        • xantoxis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sure, but millions of women are able to separate fiction from reality, and thus are able to appreciate a story which didn’t really happen, unlike this anon

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Hmm, yea it’s probably the Anon who doesn’t understand reality and fiction, not the people taking a greentext at face value and making sexual judgements.

            • eskimofry@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Did you not read the banner before coming here? The whole point is to make fun of 4chan, perhaps find a few diamonds in the rough.

              • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                4chan makes fun of itself you arn’t going to add anything there. The purpose of this community “greentext” is to take a specific style of post that 4chan uses (that is almost certainly an absurd joke and not the secret desires of the poster) and join in on the joke. Kind of like how “memes” work.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Rose had adopted a new life under an assumed name after the sinking. Her family wasn’t even aware that she had been on the Titanic, much less met what she considered her soulmate.

      Rose allowed herself to tell the story that had weighed on her for 70 years, nearly her entire life, because she knew she was nearing the end of her life.

      That’s why her scenes are so powerful.

      • griD@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        OT:
        I can’t find the critique of this movie from a classicist viewpoint anymore. That was one interesting read.

      • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m so confused because I thought Rose was an amalgamation but you’re speaking of a singular individual in a factual way that makes me wonder how wrong I am. Is there really a Rose from the titanic that aligns with what you’re saying?

  • Sekrayray@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is a really good example of me feeling really one-sided about something and then having my mind changed by the comment section. Somehow I didn’t think about the fact that being on the Titanic sinking would be a pretty pivotal memory in someone’s life lol.

  • spaphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lots of sensitive susans in the comments. If you don’t like it block it and move on. There’s too many people on lemmy that want to dictate what everyone can and can’t see rather than moderating what they themselves see.

    • _lunar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      what the hell are you even talking about? nobody is calling for this post to be removed. criticism isn’t censorship.

    • z00s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you don’t want to see the “sensitive susans”, block them and move on.

    • Chriszz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lemmy is a pretty bad echo chamber at the moment. Here it seems like there’s only ever one right opinion.

      • ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Apparently that’s the misogynistic one, based on a whole series of posts on the front page at the moment and the hundreds of gross comments that have followed.

        • myxi@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I don’t get what’s up with people nowadays throwing up the adjective “misogynistic” everywhere, when 80% of the time they’re really not seeing something misogynistic, but rather some ideologically conservative crap.

    • ShustOne@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      How is recommending someone to not interact with a post they don’t like because you don’t like a different opinion anything but being a sensitive Susan yourself?

      • spaphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        why the fuck you going around on the internet telling people what they can and can’t do.

        • ShustOne@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I didn’t tell you to do or not do anything. I’m criticizing you for doing the very thing you criticized someone else for doing. Also you don’t follow your own advice of downvote and move on.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s hypocritical. If you can’t take it then don’t dish it. Calling out obviously bad greentext is part of this community.

  • Meldroc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Of course, because a forced arranged marriage to a narcissistic fuckwit would have made her life so much better… /s

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, the whole movie centered around her memories while people explored the wreck site (if my memory is correct, I haven’t seen it since around 2000). It would be like if you were walking around your old high school at the end of your life and someone gets pissed because you remembered that day the new girl banged you under the bleachers and then died in a gymnasium fire.

      What else was she supposed to think about?

    • beardown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Perhaps James Cameron in particular doesn’t have the most grounded understanding of human relationships, especially from a woman’s perspective

  • calypsopub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Speaking as a wife and mother, it’s likely the only time in her adult life that somebody focused on her wants and needs instead of expecting her to cater to theirs.

      • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe she got married when she was young and naive and was pressured by her family to settle down with the first half decent man she met. And then by the time she grew up and learned to think about her own needs, she already had kids who needed looking after more than she did.

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yes - my point is I do most (almost all) of the cooking and cleaning because I love my partner. In fact I just washed her underwear by hand in the sink. Her needs are meticulously attended to, it’s not the default in heterosexual relationships that a woman be emotionally neglected.

    • spaphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Following that thought through fully: and her wants for those two days happened to be dick from a homeless man.

      Lol. I get what you’re saying though.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    She wasn’t on her death bed. She was a mobile old lady who was flown out to a marine vessel to talk to scientists. She dies in her sleep at the end of “old age” and isn’t suffering from any ailment. Also, the story is about how a poor boy showed a rich girl a different life and rescued her from her abusive fiance. What woman wouldn’t want to be rescued from an abusive relationship by 20 year old Leo on the world’s most extravagant cruise ship? Then at the end after she dies, she sees her long lost love in the context she remembers him: dapper, well dressed, and surrounded by gilded beautiful fixtures and things at the stairwell.