Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin will call for DNC officials’ neutrality to be codified in the party’s official rules and bylaws, two Democratic sources tell CNN. Martin has already been telling DNC members of his plans and will explain more in a call with members Thursday afternoon.

. . . “No DNC officer should ever attempt to influence the outcome of a primary election, whether on behalf of an incumbent or a challenger,” Martin told reporters on a call Thursday. “Voters should decide who our primary nominees are, not DNC leadership.”

The DNC’s Rules & Bylaws committee is expected to vote on Martin’s proposal next month in a virtual meeting. If the committee approves the proposal it will advance to a full vote of the DNC membership in August.

The push for the new rule comes days after Hogg, who beat out a crowded field to become one of three DNC at-large vice chairs in February, announced his plan to help primary incumbent Democrats in safe districts through his group Leaders We Deserve. The organization plans to spend a total of $20 million in next year’s midterms supporting young people running for office.

Hogg stressed that his effort would not target Democrats in competitive districts or use any DNC resources, including voter files or donor lists. He told CNN in an interview last week that he would not endorse in the presidential primaries if he is still a DNC leader.

“I don’t take it personally,” Hogg said of the criticism of his primary challenge. “There’s a difference in strategy here, and the way that we think things need to be done.”

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The DNC version of neutrality is blocking progressives. Sure they’ll happily codify a rule that Hogg cannot help young progressives primary incumbents election while pretending it’s about actually neutrality and letting the voters choose. But they’ll be just as happy to throw that rule out when they want to support some Republican in sheep’s clothing to kick out a progressive next time around.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      The single most important job of the DNC is keeping corporate candidates in office and keeping the money flowing. These fuckos have never been impartial. Anyone else still pissed at fucking Hoyer and the DCCC trying to get the progressive candidate to drop out of a primary?

      From the above recording, Tellemann to Hoyer: “So before we, before we go any further on that, Crow is the favorite, in no small part Congressman Hoyer, because the DCCC not only put its finger on the scale, but started jumping on the scale very early on…I mean, it’s undemocratic to have a small elite select someone and then try to rig the primary against the other people running. And that is basically what’s been happening”

      This was after the DNC had rat fucked Bernie, foisted Hillary on everyone, and lost to the serial failure, Fuckhead.

      For what it’s worth: I just copied this from my response on the other thread with the same article.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Hogg isn’t looking for young progressives. He idolizes Pelosi, Clinton, Jeffries. The do-nothing incumbents he wants to replace are useless, true. But he wants to replace them with younger versions of centrist corporatists, not progressives.

      The guillotine party needs to remove him along with the rest of the DNC leadership.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m sorry where are you getting this information from? Everything I’ve read about him says he’s progressive and looking for progressive candidates. He’s a very staunch gun control advocate (I think you’d be shocked at how many corporate Democrats are not). Which is understandable because he was a survivor of a school gun massacre.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m sorry where are you getting this information from?

          From his own statements about various prominent Democrats. When I talk about useless Democratic fossils, I’m referring to people like Nancy Pelosi, yet he calls her “effective” and a “fighter”. She’s not. She hasn’t been “progressive” in over 40 years. The centrist, corporatist leaders he supports should tell you he wants a younger version of the same corporatist party.

          Disarming in the face of fascism is ludicrous. Gun control is not a progressive issue. Go far enough to the left, and we want our guns again.

          I think you’d be shocked at how many corporate Democrats are not.

          Every corporate democrat supports gun control. Gun control is keeping the party locked in the center. Every time we start gaining traction on progressive issues like universal healthcare, punitive marginal tax rates, wealth/securities taxes, or anything else to wrestle power away from oligarchy, the old-guard corporate lapdogs trot out gun control to stall any leftward movement and drive the party right back to the center.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That’s a lot of accusing there. And Hogg is going to help through his PAC anyway.