ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agoAbility of holding ruleslemmy.worldimagemessage-square98linkfedilinkarrow-up1868arrow-down118
arrow-up1850arrow-down1imageAbility of holding ruleslemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square98linkfedilink
minus-squaregrrgyle@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days agoThis is a really bad definition because it very obviously excludes people who transition to women later in life.
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-22 days agoThat’s intentional. But it’s also a really bad definition because it excludes most women over the age of 50.
minus-squarerambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoTechnically not. They were born with the ability to hold eggs but lost it. Not saying I agree with the transphobe, but the definition technically doesn’t exclude the elderly.
This is a really bad definition because it very obviously excludes people who transition to women later in life.
That’s intentional.
But it’s also a really bad definition because it excludes most women over the age of 50.
Technically not. They were born with the ability to hold eggs but lost it. Not saying I agree with the transphobe, but the definition technically doesn’t exclude the elderly.