• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeeaaaahhh, another one of those things that sounds nice on paper… No thanks, but thanks.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Oh of course it is.

          My problem is that you apparently are one of those “if it isn’t my way it’s the wrong way” kinda guy on this topic.

          Anarchism isn’t the only alternative, so to say, and very much not the best one as in reality it won’t scale Because human beings are a bit of a dick, in general. Same goes for communism, it requires you to kill a lot of people and basically become a dictatorship.

          I’m very much for a highly limited form of capitalism (which at it’s core isn’t bad, it’s the freedom to freely trade) with loads of laws in place to limit the size of it (no company larger than 1000 employees, no company larger than networth of 50 million, no personal net worth larger than 10 million, that sort of stuff) and loads of taxes to apply those laws (no taxes for the poor, richest pay up to 100% income after certain level, etc, to always make sure nobody gets too rich, too powerful

          • NSRXN@scribe.disroot.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            it won’t scale

            you can’t prove this

            communism, it requires you to kill a lot of people and basically become a dictatorship.

            communism is a stateless classless moneyless society. it can’t be a dictatorship.

            I don’t think you know what you are talking about