• pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Atm we got it, this is the magic sweet spot where we want to be

    172 seats exactly with lib+ndp+green

    and conservatives can’t even threaten a vote of non confidence with bloc’s help. (1 vote short)

    But they could trigger it with that 1 green seat’s help, which means liberals have to stay on the good side of that 1 green seat XD

    • trashboat@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Hopefully there won’t be a Joe Manchin situation where just one of the liberals starts siding with the conservatives on just about everything to negate the majority (though I may be misinterpreting how the system works, I’m not super aware of how Canada’s legislature functions)

      I blame Manchin alone for a lot of what we weren’t able to get done under Biden

      • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If any vote ever fails in our government, it triggers an instant re-election. It’s called the Vote of Non Confidence

        It’s probably one of the most key parts of why our government is a little bit more resistant to clown-showing, because even a small crack in the parliament triggers a new election.

        So bills can only be tabled if the gov is 100% confident it will have the votes.

        Which means the conservatives could table a bill if they knew the NDP + Bloc would side with them on it, as then they have the votes to pass it.

        But since it’s the NDP, a very progressive party, it means they actually hold that fine balance of mediating power between liberals and conservatives.

        It’s pretty solid actually, and makes it so everyone the entire term could pass a reasonable bill.

        Pretty sure this last term the conservatives and liberals did agree on some stuff and some bills passed with both approving it, iirc.

        I think forcing them to occasionally work together like that helps temper the fascism lol.

      • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The 1 seat they got was in the green party stronghold (co leaders home town)

        I have zero clue what her platform is, prolly environmentalist tho.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Generally to the left of the NDP. Kinda unrealistic, TBH, because they don’t have to worry about costing it or carrying it through.

        • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You’re conveniently leaving out the fact that the federal Greens spent the last several years destroying itself through infighting. Remember the leader that was elected to replace the long suffering Elizabeth May who then stole a bunch of money, started a bunch of law suits against the party and then May had to take back over under a joint leadership?

          They’re a novelty party, not a party of governance.

          (I have voted Green several times, but never again in their current arrangement)

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Sure, but go check what the US Green party is to compare and you’ll realize that the Canadian party isn’t so bad

            • kandykarter@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Using “well at least it’s not as bad in America” in these contexts is both dismissive of valid criticism and also a staggeringly low bar