Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-23 days agoIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-squaremessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down13
arrow-up162arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-23 days agomessage-square50linkfedilink
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 days agoThe treaty isn’t the technology, it’s the result of people much better informed on the topic considering the scenario you are asking about. The technology is the hypothetical anti-ballistic missiles.
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·2 days agoThat’s foolproof?
The treaty isn’t the technology, it’s the result of people much better informed on the topic considering the scenario you are asking about.
The technology is the hypothetical anti-ballistic missiles.
That’s foolproof?