Hasan Piker, the biggest progressive political streamer in America, was detained by Customs and Border Protection for hours of questioning upon returning to the U.S. from a trip to France this weekend. Piker posted about the incident on X and later talked about it on stream.

He was detained in Chiago and questioned for two hours about protected journalistic activities like who he’s interviewed and his political beliefs. He was asked whether or not he’d interviewed Hamas, Houthis, or Hezbollah members. He was questioned about his opinions on Trump and Israel and asked about his history of bans on Twitch. His phone and laptop were not confiscated.

  • parpol@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No one is arguing whether America or Israel is bad.

    No one deserved to be killed or lose their loved ones on 9/11 or any other event. Thinking that civilians deserve to die because a government is bad is terrorist mentality.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      When someone says “America,” it seems obvious they’re talking about the country as a whole or its leadership, and not individual people. He very clearly is not saying “Americans deserved to die.”

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That is not as obvious as you think it is. I would argue that the first thing most people would think it meant is “americans deserved to die”, not “the Bush administration deserved the scrutiny and criticism it brought”

        • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Tell me what trial did bush or subsequent war criminal administration faced to make it an argument that people don’t support their actions?

          One even got a nobel peace prize, despite war crimes. Got no pushback from the populace.

          If you harbor criminals with open records (who knows how many closed records), be ready for some retaliation?

          Isnt this what US/Israel claims when they attack civs? But somehow they’re never labeled poorly as “war crimes” or “terrorists”. hmm… makes you think

          But don’t be afraid call all the region terrorists, if it makes you sleep better.

          • parpol@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Whataboutism, and excusing inexcusable actions because of “retaliation”.

            I haven’t once condoned anything the US military did. Doesn’t mean people deserved to die.

            • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              It also didn’t mean that those who were wronged by the American state should have remained silent and peaceful in front of mass killings perpetrated by all kind of administrations leading the American government. Especially when no legal recourse was given to them.

              Were you an Arab who lost his entire family under American bombardments because of the oil stored in your nation soil wouldn’t you had wanted some kind of retaliation against that nation? Can you empathize at all?