Hasan Piker, the biggest progressive political streamer in America, was detained by Customs and Border Protection for hours of questioning upon returning to the U.S. from a trip to France this weekend. Piker posted about the incident on X and later talked about it on stream.

He was detained in Chiago and questioned for two hours about protected journalistic activities like who he’s interviewed and his political beliefs. He was asked whether or not he’d interviewed Hamas, Houthis, or Hezbollah members. He was questioned about his opinions on Trump and Israel and asked about his history of bans on Twitch. His phone and laptop were not confiscated.

  • sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hasan’s a moron, but detaining him for his opinions is definitely unwarranted and stinks of the same bullshit reasons that this administration has been using to play hide and seek and deport anyone they don’t like.

      • Baaahb@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        He preaches hard left politics. Mostly people want to call him a moron for hot takes, but the majority of what he says is fine.

      • DrDickHandler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        He isn’t. There are many right wing groups purposely spreading hate to discredit him as he is one of the only left wing political streamer criticizing Israel, Russia, Democrats, etc…

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I find it crazy to hear this coming from the US. It was all over the news when Serbia detained a Croatian singer trying to cross the border or trying to deport people with Croatian citizenship, crazy to see the same thing happening in the US.

  • shaserlark@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Never heard of this guy but must have hit a nerve if a whole Hasbara brigade is showing up here to trash talk him.

    That being said, it’s an interesting turn of events that apparently units around immigration take the role of Gestapo. Makes a lot of sense given what types of people would even want to do such a job but it’s still not what I expected when they said fascism is coming back.

    • Secluded_Serenity@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      It should be a surprise to no one that government goons are totally on board with fascism. Did anyone think for a second that they would have objections? A person that chose to be in a position of authority is going to complain when an authoritarian leader gives them more power? Yeah right. It’s all about the power trip for those thugs.

  • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ive been stopped and questioned by border patrol for hours at least 3 times over the last 15 years. Apparently I’m an asshole and this is how they “get their revenge” on you. This guy was only stopped once… amateur.

  • daepicgamerbro69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    These people get to ask Hasan head-empty questions for hours and get paid. To think his entire fanbase has been doing it for free this entire time

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Like so many other political pundits, Hasan Piker is an asshole but obviously he should have the right to be that without anyone (edit with official authority) questioning him.

  • Sʏʟᴇɴᴄᴇ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Crazy that in his stream with FD a few weeks ago he was adamant that he’d be one of the last people impacted by the immigration/border control nonsense.

    I think it just goes to show how, even otherwise well informed people, can underestimate how much fascism will impact them personally. It can be easy to distance yourself until it is in your face, placing you in cuffs, or forcible removing you from your home. I hope he learns a lesson from this experience.

  • audaxdreik@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m starting to feel like a lot of the takes against Hasan are in bad faith. I watched a little recap and I felt it was both clear and obvious that YOU (normal person) shouldn’t do what he did.

    But being a notable person of interest who was already (questionably?) illegally caught up in a bad system, there’s reason to believe things wouldn’t take a turn for the better just because he asked to lawyer up. So he took a calculated risk and engaged with the situation enough to gather a first hand experience he could report on. Concrete evidence, there’s value in that. It was his decision to make.

    To reiterate, obvious YOU don’t do that. Stay silent, lawyer up.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Wow this is bad. Even if you deem questioning necessary, it being done by border protection is a bad sign. There are other mechanisms in place for that.

    The US is spiraling fast.

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Question

      When do who exactly deem that “questioning” journalists is a good idea? Who? Can anyone deem anyone else for “questioning”?

      What are the wrong answers? What is the questions about? What do they question about and why?

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Hasan is on tape saying his goal is to radicalise his audience. Calling him a journalist mightve sound plausible four years ago.

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Sorry, you’re right. He’s an influencer. He will say anything that appeals to his clan. But these types are so incapable of engineering anything that doesn’t funnel into building an audience

      • Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If there were legitimate questions about someone’s affiliation with terrorist organisations it does make sense to question them regardless of if they are a journalist or not.

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          But… Is this the case with this guy? He can be investigated by watching and concluding that he says what he thinks is a cool leftist guy would say and don’t hold any beliefs at all to rival his need for an audience that can prove his worth to himself which quickly becomes a desperate way to live

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Remember folks, it starts with the leftists, then it doesn’t stop until we lose for good. Every 80 years.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It didn’t start with leftists. It started with immigrants, but we didn’t do anything, because both parties are united in bigotry and vile hatred against immigrants.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      But here’s the thing most leftists are pseudo-leftists (AKA controlled opposition)

      So deal with that first.

  • goodeye8@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    200
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Is anyone surprised? This isn’t a jab at Hasan, it’s just a reminder that fascists will crack down on opponents. The likes of Hasan will be deliberately targeted until they’ve been silenced one way or another, and then they’ll come for you.

  • LaLaLa@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    213
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No fan of Hasan, but this shouldn’t be happening to anyone.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        You desperately need to escape the bubble that you’re in as a member of Ethan’s community. He’s become a useful idiot for Israeli propagandists and now even the fascists - as evidenced by the details of Ethan’s false accusations against Hasan being brought up by the CBP agent who detained him. By attacking and slandering pro-Palestinian content creators and influencers he feels personally slighted by he is unwittingly doing the bidding of Netanyahu and Trump both.

        • Clbull@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          42 minutes ago

          I’m not a H3 fan but Hasan and his followers are toxic shitbags that have been relentless harassing the Kleins by peddling false rumours of child abuse and maliciously calling CPS on them. And iDubbbz is frankly a hypocrite for how he handled his excuse of a Content Cop on H3.

      • dan00@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Seeing the downvotes on this moron makes me think I’m in the right community. Thanks lemmings. Rodents strong together. 🐁

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        And fr0gan (part of his group) got a Twitch ban for literally wishing PTSD upon American soldiers.

      • arsCynic@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        He literally supports terrorism on stream - no wonder he got in trouble

        Defamatory accusations like this literally need a video source.
        Hitchen’s razor: “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

        - -
        ✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.

        • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 hours ago

          His takes are pretty well known outside of the echo chambers like this one. It’s worth noting that I delivered the proof and it got downvoted to oblivion - people here specifically DO NOT want to hear the truth

          • Deceptichum@quokk.auM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Where’s this proof? All I see is you linking to a video of him saying America deserved retaliation from all the peoples it’s fucked over, over the years.

            Insensitive and inflammatory sure, but it is not supporting terrorism.

            • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I initially linked to open letter by congressman Torres that talks in detail about what Hasan said live on stream. That letter includes PDF with all the evidence - citations, and clips with all the shit Hasan said.

              • Deceptichum@quokk.auM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Thanks.

                Okay, so I’ve had a bit of a read. First off there is nothing to directly ‘confirm’ he supports terrorists, at best/worst he ‘has “no issue” with Hezbollah’ and he interviewed someone labeled the ‘Yemeni Pirate’ who went viral on TikTok leading to the aforementioned interview. This figure says they are not part of the Houthi, but they were on a vessel seized by the Houthi, he could simply be a paid mercenary so we can’t confirm or deny if they actually are Houthi.

                The Jewish stuff isn’t worth touching. It’s 100% going to be something critical of Israel/Zionism framed as antisemitism or terrorism.

                Mocking a Republican congressman and thanking the opposing side of the US invasion of Afghanistan for injuring them isn’t terrorism, it’s just funny af. Fuck Republicans.


                I’ve received a fair few reports for your posts tbh in regards to false accusations, but the Yemeni guy thing is a bit iffy, and he may have used his platform to promote a terrorist. So I’m going to leave it all up.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Hasan has never supported terrorism on stream. Go back to drooling at the rat shaker

        • parpol@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          83
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Which part is nonsense? The part where he said the houthis actions were a good thing, the part in the full debate you linked where he quadrupled down on it, or the fact that the houthis are registered as a terrorist organization and have kidnapped and held innocent civilians hostage for a year?

          I saw the full unedited Ethan and Hasan debate, and Hasan’s context and excuses just made me disgusted.

          • Crikeste@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            56
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            You’re doing the thing.

            Hasan explained why he supports the Houthis actions, why are you leaving out that context? Is it because most people might actually sympathize with it as well? Y’all just can’t help yourselves with your outrage, can you? lmfao

            • parpol@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              58
              ·
              12 hours ago

              No one sympathizes with the houthis.

              Also I’m not leaving out any context. There is no universe where anything the houthis did was excusable. Hasan did explain it, and it made him look worse. He tries to justify the kidnapping of innocent civilians (some Asian workers who had nothing to do with it, who were working on a brittish vessel only partially owned by some Jewish person.) and holding them hostage for a year in that debate. “What else were they supposed to do?” How about not terrorism? How about going to Palestine? How about activism, propaganda, anything other than terrorism?

              • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                While you scrutinize the finer points of morality relating to the detainment of sailors as part of an economic blockade, Israel is intentionally starving millions of children. Your priorities are so out of whack it’s absurd that you don’t recognize it. You don’t have to support the Houthis to acknowledge that their economic blockade of Israel is justified. If engaging in that level of nuance makes me a terrorist in your eyes, you’ve completely lost the plot.

                Besides, the word terrorist has always been used by the US as a propaganda tool to paint specific militant groups that are enemies of US empire as barbaric and inhuman. If the basic definition of terrorism were applied fairly across the board then the IDF and US military would be considered the most prolific terrorists and the US and Israel the largest state sponsors of terror. The standard of violence is set by the oppressors.

                • Brett@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  WTF has this to do with priorities? Just because i despise the israeli government and the action they take i have to give hasan a pass when he blurts out insane takes on a daily basis?

                  Yeah, and i agree the US and Israel are in some ways full blown terror regimes which did horrible things. Doesnt take away from the fact that Hamas, Hezbollah or the Houthis are terror orgs. Yeah, sure the US caused probably more harm over the last century then the three groups together. But that doesnt legitimize anything ffs.

                  Hasan fans should really start reading books about the matters they are so invested in instead of just parroting some dumbass twitch streamer.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            48
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            You are vaguely referencing a bunch of stuff and simultaneously being angry I am not being specific enough.

            Be specific, what are you claiming Hasan has done illegally or wrongly? You claim he “supports” a “terrorist” organization but the onus is on you to prove in exhaustive and specific terms why I should believe you when you say the words “support” and '“terrorist” that you aren’t just moving empty hot air and hate around with your mouth.

            I saw the full unedited Ethan and Hasan debate, and Hasan’s context and excuses just made me disgusted.

            Nobody is surprised by this, your behavior makes it crystal clear this is the kind of position you would have.

            • parpol@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              46
              ·
              12 hours ago

              You’re trying to delegitimize what I’m saying by saying I’m emotional and unspecific, and attacking my character. You’re purposefully playing dumb to avoid the actual point I’m making. Then you try to move the goalpost by asking what he’s done that is illegal or wrong, which is not what I’m talking about.

              Here are the direct quotes so there is no mistaking it. Both points were reiterated in the video you linked.

              “I think what the houthis are doing is a good thing” -Hasan

              “We support you” -Hasan when interviewing a houthi terrorist.

              Hasan is a terrorist supporter as evident by the above direct quotes.

              As for what I found disgusting was when he excused his claims about the rape allegations being false and saying there was no evidence. Also in the video you linked.

              Nobody is surprised by this, your behavior makes it crystal clear this is the kind of position you would have.

              What is your point with this? Are you shaming me for watching the full debate that was supposed to clear everything up on both sides? Also didn’t you just link an asmongold-style reaction video to that whole debate?

              • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                “I think what the houthis are doing is a good thing” -Hasan

                That’s pretty vague. If I said I support what America does, that doesn’t necessarily mean I support the worst actions the state has ever taken.

                Hasan is a terrorist supporter as evident by the above direct quotes.

                Again, just because a group ends up on a terrorist list doesn’t really mean much besides that they’re currently unaligned with US interest. The “terrorist” dogma has really lost its bite since the war on terror began.

                • parpol@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  If the context was “America kidnapped civilians” and someone said “I think what the Americans are doing is a good thing”, then yes, that would paint a bad picture. And it was vague at first but after Hasan explained himself in the debate, it became clear that he was excusing the kidnappings.

                  Do you not think what they did was terrorism? Do you want to explain to the hostages that they were just overreacting and that their kidnappers actually aren’t that bad, and it’s just some dogma?

          • 3dmvr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            lol someone from programmingdev would have different political views they never see political posts

          • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            69
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            14 hours ago

            We literally murdered 100s of thousands prior to 9/11 and then we proceeded to murder millions of innocents after. We still deserve it.

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              47
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I wouldn’t say deserve, but I’m not surprised it happened.

              • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                26
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                Here is a simple question, if Hasan did say the U.S. “deserved” 9/11 like the fear mongers in this thread are trying to twist his words into and he meant it the way y’all claim he did, wouldn’t he still be calling for more terrorism against the U.S.?

                If Hasan isn’t actively calling for terrorism… what made him stop? Does he think the score was settled and it is back to U.S.-50 points vs Radical Islam -50 points on the scoreboard?

                No, Hasan is clearly making a point about how blowback from brutal imperial practices becomes nearly inveitable after a certain point, the use of “deserve” he is to denote how in a system where people act as political representatives of groups and derive power from publicly representing them, the more one group commits violence against another group the more likely the group of victims are to retaliate with force.

                To make the logical jump that this must mean that Hasan wants more 9/11s to happen to the U.S. where random U.S. citizens are indiscriminately killed as a symbol for something they do not control is disengenous to the extreme, and I have said elsewhere in this thread, a step in an extremely dangerous direction for the health and free speech of our society.

              • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                13 hours ago

                If you actively do something to someone, and have the prior knowledge to know what their response will be, you deserve that obvious response. If you antagonize another perpetually, you deserve their strike back. It’s not hard to follow, we literally teach this to toddlers. Violence and hate begets violence and hate, and people can only take so much before snapping.

                The only people who don’t get it are maladjusted humans who were sheltered from consequences in the past.

                • catloaf@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  20
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  I don’t think that we should teach toddlers, or anyone, really, that anyone ever deserves violence.

            • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              That and we had intel that such an attack was imminent and the Bush administration was okay with it bc they wanted to kill millions more.

              • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                They worked under the US, and reaped the benefits of our imperialist actions. obviously no one deserves to be murdered, but we are all culpable for the violence our nation commits, because we’re the ones keeping it running. The US deserved retaliation for what it partook in during the cold war, and that retaliation was never going to only include guilty parties.

                EDIT: let me put it in another perspective: if you went to a foreign nation which operated on slavery, started working there, enjoyed the goods and services provided to you by the enslaved, and socialized with the enslavers, why would you ever expect sympathy from the enslaved? You chose who to help, who to do business with, and you chose the enslavers. It really doesn’t matter if you talked about slavery being fucked up behind closed doors, you enjoyed the value ripped from the enslaved. You’re now just as culpable as the enslavers.

                Edit 2: made some edits communicating some further nuance regarding the subject. 9/11 was a tragedy, but it is largely overshadowed by the sheer scale of death our conflict with the Middle-East has had.

                • derpgon@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Would you go off yourself to stop the machine? Would you go to jail to fight for the cause? Would you sacrifice your family if it meant it would nudge anti capitalism movement?

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            65
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            14 hours ago

            “America Deserved 9/11”

            Let’s phrase this a different way. “America reaped what it sowed,” or “America made its bed and is now lying in it.” This is a pretty solid “yup” from me. We armed, trained, and funded the leaders of the group that carried out the attack, among many other things

            • parpol@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              27
              ·
              12 hours ago

              No one is arguing whether America or Israel is bad.

              No one deserved to be killed or lose their loved ones on 9/11 or any other event. Thinking that civilians deserve to die because a government is bad is terrorist mentality.

              • protist@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                24
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                12 hours ago

                When someone says “America,” it seems obvious they’re talking about the country as a whole or its leadership, and not individual people. He very clearly is not saying “Americans deserved to die.”

                • parpol@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  27
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  That is not as obvious as you think it is. I would argue that the first thing most people would think it meant is “americans deserved to die”, not “the Bush administration deserved the scrutiny and criticism it brought”

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Lol your most solid source is a random post from some politician’s web page?

            He opposes terrorism. Which is why he opposes Israel. Which is what gets him in trouble.

            He may also have said some things in support of terrorism by Hamas, which would be fucked up in my opinion. I don’t know and I have no plans to take this web page seriously about it. He is still allowed to go on the internet and say those things, according to the first amendment, and this attempt to threaten him about it is horrifying whatever his opinions are. What part of “I get to say whatever the fuck I want because those are my opinions” doesn’t make sense here?

            • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              37
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Lol your most solid source is a random post from some politician’s web page?

              Dude, you have a PDF there with ALL THE RELEVANT CITATIONS AND CLIPS from his streams in second paragraph. This is the primary source. You can’t bring anything better to the table.

              • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                14 hours ago

                He is still allowed to go on the internet and say those things, according to the first amendment, and this attempt to threaten him about it is horrifying whatever his opinions are. What part of “I get to say whatever the fuck I want because those are my opinions” doesn’t make sense here?

                • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 hours ago

                  Also, you don’t have to watch Hasan Piker for long to see that this characterization of him is totally absurd, I don’t know whether it is more embarassing that people actually believe Hasan Piker is like this or that they are willing to lie so boldfacedly about it.

                  Hasan doesn’t advocate for violence like this, I am sure he has said some spicey shit but trying to frame his as a terrorist is a dangerous road to walk and these people are doing it gleefully.

                • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  30
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  What part of “I get to say whatever the fuck I want because those are my opinions” doesn’t make sense here?

                  Promoting terrorism isn’t protected by free speech laws. Never was, never will be

          • small44@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            14 hours ago

            You zionits been using antisemitism claim till it lost all it’s meaning

              • blindsight@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                I don’t think so.

                Many people have been calling anything speaking against Israel and its actions (genocide) in Palestine antisemitic, when it’s not saying anything about Jewish people or Judaism. Criticism against the existence of or actions of Israel is, more accurately, anti-Zionism, which isn’t racism and doesn’t deserve any special protection, just like criticism of American hegemony isn’t racism.

      • el_bhm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Enjoy arguing with man children level arguments.

        Hassan is as much of a leftist as Srump or The Dipshit are right wing.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Pathetic, and for the record Hasan would interview Hamas, because interviewing someone is not an endorsement of someone if you aren’t a piece of shit fraud like the members of the Trump administration who treat interviews as theater to spread propaganda with no evidence are.

    Assuming someone interviewing someone you consider a threat is thus by association a threat of the same kind is a shockingly dangerous precendent to set and basically spells out the extinction of a free press in no uncertain terms.