SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 1 day agoDefinition of rulesanitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1424arrow-down116cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1408arrow-down1imageDefinition of rulesanitylemmy.worldSoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square48linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarecrusa187@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up42arrow-down7·1 day agoBold of you to assume there will be primaries, since those haven’t been conducted in good faith since 2008.
minus-squaremat dave@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down1·1 day agoYeah. Last year the person who won appeared in one debate, lost, and refused to debate again. I don’t really understand what the election is after that mess.
Bold of you to assume there will be primaries, since those haven’t been conducted in good faith since 2008.
Yeah. Last year the person who won appeared in one debate, lost, and refused to debate again. I don’t really understand what the election is after that mess.