PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 days agoMilitaries ARE capable of learning, right...?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageMilitaries ARE capable of learning, right...?lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 days agomessage-square4linkfedilink
minus-squareSSTF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-220 days agoYou’ll use rifled MBT main guns and you’ll like it.
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-219 days agoTo be fair here, they really did it because they liked it. “It” being the funny sounds of projectiles getting squashed against armor.
minus-squareSSTF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-219 days agoI always figured the doctrine and procurement created mutual inertia against change. They like it because they have it, and they have it because they like it.
You’ll use rifled MBT main guns and you’ll like it.
To be fair here, they really did it because they liked it.
“It” being the funny sounds of projectiles getting squashed against armor.
I always figured the doctrine and procurement created mutual inertia against change.
They like it because they have it, and they have it because they like it.