• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Yeah definitely don’t vote for guys who enacted the laws banning large campaign contributions from companies until the conservative SCOTUS threw it out seven years later.

    The guys who expand welfare every time we let them in.

    The dudes who regulate large companies and protect the environment.

    The ones who stand with the people on the picket lines.

    The party who as a whole defend rights to our own bodies and reproductive rights.

    The people who want to tax unrealized gains and create a wealth cap.

    They’re not going to protect us from monied interests or christofascism.

    /Sarcasm

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Instead, voted Republican! Er I mean third party. That’ll totally fix everything tomorrow!!

      Then the best part? You pretend you’re blameless when fascism ushers in when you could’ve helped stop it. Nay, that’s not it actually, you’re super virtuous because you refused to look at the road ahead of you showing as plain as day what will happen if people don’t elect the Democrat.

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Mmm… I would have voted democrats, if I was american (we have a similar situation here in aus).

      But I’m under no illusion that they will save us. Both of our centrist parties (Dems, Labor) are still completely on board with neoliberalism and are still expanding environmentally destructive industries. Yes, they are clearly less fucked than the right wing parties, but they also aren’t going to save us. We need to do more than just vote.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Australian ranked choice is pretty sweet by comparison. It even makes greens viable as a real party rather than a Russian psy-op like they are in the USA.

        • naught101@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, for sure. It’s been gamed before, but it’s been gradually improving over the last few decades

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If they could win consistently, there would be space in the party for more people like Bernie and AOC to push it toward the left. As things are, they keep losing to Republicants and this keeps pulling them to the right. What we need is a fight inside the party to change what it is. We can’t have that as long as we keep losing the fight outside the party to people who are vastly worse than everyone in the Democrats.

        • naught101@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Perhaps. Personally I think the causality is the other way around. If the left within the Dems had more influence, the party would be more inspiring, and more people would get out to vote…

          But yeah, either way, unless you’re inside the dems making that happen (and that’s hard, because the neoliberals within the dems have lots of money and power), then you don’t have much influence over electoral politics. Better and easier to get involved in other forms of politics, IMO. And work on the voting stuff when you’re near an election, if you want.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I’d love to believe that everyone world turn out for more liberal policies but unfortunately the bulk of democratic voters are not like me. At least right now they aren’t confident enough to take risks on further left policies. Winning is what emboldens more risk taking, not losing.

            • naught101@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              What do you think WOULD make more people turn out for the democrats, if not more progressive policies?

              • scarabic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I feel you may be thinking that I’m against more progressive policies. Nothing could be further from the truth. I travelled to a neighboring state to campaign for Bernie during the primary where he was up against Biden. What I learned from that primary is that democratic voters are not in fact champing at the bit for more progressive policies. Don’t ask me why not. I believe it’s probably multiple answers. A lot of them are old and still carry the ancient stigma toward socialism. A lot of them are affluent and while they might like to see a kinder world for trans and gay people, are not eager for economic revolution. Some are minorities who don’t necessarily want their race to be spoken to like it’s their main issue, and economically may in fact be entrepreneurial minded and not aspiring to government incentive programs.

                I do think that we need to win the voters back and actually have a progressive movement again. We don’t have one now. It’s not just the politicians holding us back from the progressive agenda we truly want. I want it, you want it, but we are not the norm. And as long as we’re fighting for our very lives against fascists, it will never be time to split the left so we can push the tip of the spear further left.

                I don’t like it. That’s just the way it is.

                • naught101@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Don’t ask me why not

                  Seems like this is something the democrats really need to put a lot of work into figuring out. But it doesn’t really seem like the mainstream of the DNC is all that interested. It seems like they think they already have it worked out, and that people should just follow along…

                  Re: “progressive” and “socialism”, sure, I get you. I think that there’s potentially a LOT of scope for simple reframing that would resonate though, like Gary’s Economics’ “tax wealth not work” frame. But I don’t think the DNC would pick that up, because too many of them are wealthy, or mates with wealthy people…

    • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They’re not going to protect us from monied interests or christofascism

      They literally already didn’t do that. We’re under unified christofascist rule currently, and the Democrats did not protect us from it. They’re still not doing anything. Best they can do is a “strong letter.” They used up all their energy keeping a lid on Bernie.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        We’re under christofascism because that’s what 77 Million assholes voted for.

        Democrats fall in love. Republicans fall in line.