Several elected leaders in Oregon declared a state of emergency on Tuesday for downtown Portland over the public health and public safety crisis fueled by fentanyl.

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler and Multnomah County Chair Jessica Vega Pederson made the declaration for a 90-day period during which collaboration and response will come from a command center downtown. The three governments are directing their agencies to work with first responders in connecting people addicted to the synthetic opioid with resources including drug treatment programs and to crack down on drug sales.

“Our country and our state have never seen a drug this deadly addictive, and all are grappling with how to respond,” Kotek said in a statement.

    • Aabbcc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Legalizing and regulating is not promoting the drug. But it means those who are addicted will be sure its clean (free of tranq) and won’t need to be purchased from drug dealers. Additionally, if you’re not going to be arrested for using it you will feel safer to use safe injection sites and other harm reduction resources

      Any meaningful path to lowering addiction rates and getting people clean won’t involve sending people to jail for possession or use

        • Aa!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          We did that in Oregon. So far it’s being regarded as a failure.

          Definitely needs to be thought through better for it to work

      • infamousta@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Progressive” cities in the US can’t even do this for very mainstream drugs like alcohol. Literally a drug that can kill you via either overdose or withdrawal, and alcoholics are corralled into “drunk tanks” with no medical assistance.

        It’s my particular rabbit hole and I’ve done the A-B tests, I am better off tapering in my home than seeking medical help. Fent users will not get any compassionate care from the gov.

    • stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think the mentality of the comment “legalize, regulate” is less, “O yeah let’s let people do fent recreationally!” and more, “If someone is found to have personal-use fent, they have bigger problems that need addressing so don’t punish them for that.”

      Treat them like victims vs treating them like criminals. At least that is how I understand it. It doesn’t mean let them walk away and spread fent to other users, it means to support them.

      Tho I am curious how others understand the statement. I am also curious how it would be actionable, like what should the state do to support these people?