Cultural genocide is genocide.

Citation needed. What legal documents codify it?

Another example is the Uyghur genocide which you probably deny too.

Neither the UN, nor your empire’s leadership believes that such a genocide has ever happened. This is just another case of ‘Iraq has WMDs’ that you eagerly buy because designated enemies of your empire are lying untermenschen, apparently.

“Cultural genocide” is some bullshit the US made up so they could accuse China of a genocide even though there’s nobody dying, try harder patriot

I’m going by UN and ICC defintions, removal of children from war zones is a war crime but not genocide, read Putins warrant at some point he’s charged with one but not the other

I’m not sure what defintion you’re using beyond ‘goverment I don’t like does bad thinks so that’s genocide’

And again how can you condemn Russia’s ‘genocide’ in Ukraine, but not condemn the western collation’s(US, UK, Ukraine etc) same and more severe actions in its invasions and occupations of sovereign countries in the last few decades? why are only white victims worthy of your sympathy? your refusal to condemn that combined with your white washing of nazis makes your ideological position clear yo anyone reading this exchange

I agree that CCP has persecuted the Muslim minority in Xinjang and i condemn it, but I also recognise that the west as committed far more severe human rights abuses agaisnt Muslims domestically and abroad but I’m guessing you don’t condemn that cultural and actual genocide? why?

and yes the argument can be made that there has been cultural genocide, UN investigations have shown no evidence of actual genocide i.e mass killings in Xinjang, statementsof genocidal intent etc

Unlike the actions of the west in Iraq and Afghanistan, dont you think it strange that the Xinjang cultural genocide is constantly derided in western corperate press and by those who’s worldview is shaped exclusively by it like yourself, whereas the cultural and actual genocide being committed by the west isnt?

Can’t you see the fact that you condemn China’s human rights abuses but not the wests cultural and actual genocide show your concern to motivate by cynical politics rather than actual empathy for religious and ethnic minorities?

It literally does

It literally does not. In your example, the children are not being killed, including by imposition of conditions calculated to bring about their destruction.

So you are fine with dictatorship.

The word ‘dictatorship’ does not mean anything.
If you want to argue otherwise, please, provide a definition. If it isn’t just your own definition, then also provide a citation.

Doesn’t make dictatorship ok.

Well, the word ‘dictatorship’ doesn’t mean anything. You are always going to engage in goalpost movement whenever cornered.

Also, you are missing certain details such as Lysenkoism

Check the date of Lenin’s death, then check when Lysenko became relevant.
Also, pretty sure nobody is going to support Lysenko here. That was a mistake.

But hey, speaking of imposing weird bans on scientists, I’m going to remind you how your empire has been banning Russian scientists and engineers. You seem to be fine with that.

forced internal population transfers

Your empire engaging in a forced population transfer has been highly publicised for the past one and a half years or so. (Mind you, Ukraine has provided assistance with that, as well.) You seem to be very fine with that.

purges

Not well informed enough about that, but I doubt that you are, either. Still not nearly as bad as what your empire was doing at the time, and not as bad as what it has been doing.

the Gulag

And that was worse than your prisons why, exactly?

and the Holodomor

Haha.
Historians who specialise on the famine disagree with you. There was no intention there, and the USSR both took effort to prevent it, and to stop it once it started.
Meanwhile, your empire has deliberately caused famines, including in Ireland and in India.
If you want to blame the USSR for all disasters happening on its territory, then, by applying the same standards to your empire, we can conclude that the USSR is much better in that regard.

Also, none of those things happened under Lenin. Literally check the dates.

Maybe if Russia stopped threatening neighbouring countries

Notably, the vast majority of Russia’s neighbours have been doing fine.

But also, good to know that you think that fascism is okay when you do it (if it was about being threatened, you wouldn’t even try calling Russia ‘fascist’, as NATO threatening Russia would give it justification by your own standards).

Which NATO weapons?

Like, for example, literally the ones being used by NATO’s proxy in this war.

Which bars (I assume you mean bases?)?

I did mean ‘bases’. I blame gesture input.

I recommend you google ‘NATO military bases’ or ‘US military bases’ or ‘US military presence around the world’.

What evidence do you have that they want to subjugate Russia?

Literally what NATO has been doing to the rest of the world.
What evidence do you have for NATO not trying to do what it has been doing throughout its existence in this particular case by deploying weapons close to Russia’s most populated areas and committing terrorist attacks and after having destroyed Russia’s economy and killing millions of people in Russia in the 90s?