Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argued President Biden is a greater threat to democracy than former President Trump because Kennedy was blocked on social media platforms during the Biden administration, which he labeled as an effort to “censor political speech” and undermine the First Amendment.
Hey look, an opinion piece being posited as fact, by a non-reputable source, with references to either twitter posts, or articles posted on the same website! I love this game.
My turn.
^Directly from the FBI.
^also FBI
Images of the traitors who are wanted for arrest: https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/capitol-violence-images
Now to give you the benefit of the doubt, I did a little reading into where you could possibly be coming up with your strawman, and I did find this particular piece of rhetoric: “FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was coordinated”
Further review of the article shows that not even that supports your mis(dis?)informed view.
Anyway, your rhetoric is dangerous misinformation rooted in denial of basic reality.
I eagerly await for this comment to be removed.
We don’t remove comments when they are talking about the topic.
So yes, no insurrection. What do you think an insurrection is? The Jan 6th was a bunch of idiots rioting. Nothing like, yet lefties have big crocodile tears over it. It lasted a few hours. Two people died, one was shot by an agent and one fell off a building. A believe a third may have died outside from a heart attack.
Considering the democrats have done this many times. It’s seems odd to have so many tears over it.
Also those twitter post are from the people who did the event. So that’s a first hand account.
Lets try this again- direct quotes from the FBI:
Honestly if I had my way, outright false information like this would be ban worthy.
Additionally:
The mod log from this thread disproves that.
It isn’t false. I can show many times the democrats have done it but you’ll just ignore it. Just like you ignored the previous example.
Because youre not making real comparisons. You compared two politicians protesting because of SCHOOL SHOOTINGS, to thousands of people literally breaking into the capital to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. Making that comparison undermines you credibility to an almost comical extent, and makes it impossible to take any other statement you make seriously.
It is either an insurrection or it isn’t. And thousands didn’t break in to stop a transfer of power. It’s hard to take you serious when you just make things up.
How many people were charged with insurrection ? You think thousands were charged and convicted of insurrection ? Show me where thousands were charged and convicted for insurrection.
Jesus christ…
Lets look at the numbers, shall we?
Number of people charged, federal: 1,346
Number of people who have pleaded guilty: 797
Number of individuals who have had jury, bench, or stipulated bench trials: 193
Number with mixed verdicts: 54
Number convicted on all charges: 136
Number acquitted of all charges: 3
Number of people sentenced: 827
Percentage of people sentenced who have received prison time: 64
Median sentence for those who received prison time, in days: 180
Number of cases dismissed, federal: 10
How many were charged with insurrection. You are claiming it was one. It shouldn’t be that hard to show how many were charged. That would be a big deal.
Last time I saw, it was zero. Zero people were charged for insurrection or rebellion. Zero.
Riot type charges were the most common that I’ve seen.
Two points:
You are focusing on a very specific detail, someone being charged specifically with “insurrection”-which isn’t at all how this works-and using it as a tool to dismiss every piece of evidence in front of you. This is the type of rhetoric that undermines your credibility and makes you look pedantic and ignorant.
54 people have been charged with conspiracy. I suggest you look at the article provided, it will give you not just the number of charges, but who, what charge, a description of exactly what the charge was, etc.
Through the power of literacy, we can grow together