Yes, I’m not ashamed to say that I think a party that backs a genocide, bombs children, and screws over it’s voting base is not doing good enough. Especially when they seem to have plenty of time to help out the other party, and their corporate doners.
They’ve had plenty of time and opportunity to fix plenty
of things, but chose not to. You keep saying that they “only” had 2 years, but I saw them waste those years.
You are also correct: I will never show up for a party that wants to bomb children, or picks a rapist as their candidate, or backs a genocide, or continuously caters to the rich instead of their voters. Why would I support a party that fights against what I want?
edit: Also, when have the Democrats catered to the left? I see them consistently run to the right, but I usually only see them “cater to the left” verbally, on stage when they want votes. Once elected in, they immediately turn back to the right.
Wow did I ever call it. No matter how much I point out what’s delivered, you will ignore it. Ok I’ve pointed it 2 (3?) times and it’ll be non ending. Out.
I haven’t ignored anything. They did a small handfull of good things, but they spent the majority of the time failing to deliver on easy wins.
You spent a bunch of time pointing out why they haven’t delivered. So which is it? Do they deliver? or do things keep them from delivering?
From what I’ve seen, they’ve had plenty of chances, but mostly chose to throw them away to keep their doners and rich friends happy. Maybe you are happy with them, but it’s clear that the voters are not.
Wow ok last message to deal with the sheer bad faith, which that you even try to pull off in your last word game is incredible bad faith. I told you what they deliver while they have a majority, and why they obviously can’t do anything when they don’t have majority (in house of reps, Senate, and have the white house). That you try to hammer those together shows you with can’t separate it yourself, or you’re discussing in incredible bad faith. Ok I’m out, it’ll be never ending whatever this is, like I already called.
But they didn’t deliver when they had the majority. I already pointed out the things that they didn’t deliver on, and you keep ignoring them.
I pointed out how they didn’t deliver on the things you claimed, and you keep ignoring that as well. I always find it funny when Libs argue that others are arguing in bad faith, when they won’t address the concerns brought up by others.
Yes, I’m not ashamed to say that I think a party that backs a genocide, bombs children, and screws over it’s voting base is not doing good enough. Especially when they seem to have plenty of time to help out the other party, and their corporate doners.
They’ve had plenty of time and opportunity to fix plenty of things, but chose not to. You keep saying that they “only” had 2 years, but I saw them waste those years.
You are also correct: I will never show up for a party that wants to bomb children, or picks a rapist as their candidate, or backs a genocide, or continuously caters to the rich instead of their voters. Why would I support a party that fights against what I want?
edit: Also, when have the Democrats catered to the left? I see them consistently run to the right, but I usually only see them “cater to the left” verbally, on stage when they want votes. Once elected in, they immediately turn back to the right.
Wow did I ever call it. No matter how much I point out what’s delivered, you will ignore it. Ok I’ve pointed it 2 (3?) times and it’ll be non ending. Out.
I haven’t ignored anything. They did a small handfull of good things, but they spent the majority of the time failing to deliver on easy wins.
You spent a bunch of time pointing out why they haven’t delivered. So which is it? Do they deliver? or do things keep them from delivering?
From what I’ve seen, they’ve had plenty of chances, but mostly chose to throw them away to keep their doners and rich friends happy. Maybe you are happy with them, but it’s clear that the voters are not.
Wow ok last message to deal with the sheer bad faith, which that you even try to pull off in your last word game is incredible bad faith. I told you what they deliver while they have a majority, and why they obviously can’t do anything when they don’t have majority (in house of reps, Senate, and have the white house). That you try to hammer those together shows you with can’t separate it yourself, or you’re discussing in incredible bad faith. Ok I’m out, it’ll be never ending whatever this is, like I already called.
But they didn’t deliver when they had the majority. I already pointed out the things that they didn’t deliver on, and you keep ignoring them. I pointed out how they didn’t deliver on the things you claimed, and you keep ignoring that as well. I always find it funny when Libs argue that others are arguing in bad faith, when they won’t address the concerns brought up by others.