• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’re really gonna make people start pirating out of spite lol

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Amazon did. They kept the price the same, added commercials, then offered to remove the commercials for an additional $4/month.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Is it? If they’re going to make this available for a free/ad priced tier I could see showing ads. But not for the ad free tier.

          • olutukko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            it was mostly a joke but I wouldn’t be too suprised if they actually start showing ads too

      • elvith@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If it weren’t for those pesky content breaks every now and then, they could serve even more ads. Won’t somebody think of the shareholders?

        • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Those damn consumers are so entitled! Why can’t we just serve ads continually instead of having to produce expensive content?

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve kinda wished services would do something a bit like this for a while:

    One channel for new stuff, based on your recommendations—just gives you a load of random tastes of shows without you actively picking through things

    One for stuff you rewatch. For example, if you’ve watched always sunny or peep show through a couple of times, put random episodes on this channel for when you just want something in the background

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      For the rewatch, on Plex you can build playlists and shuffle them. I do this for my kids, one wants Bluey and the other wants Peppa pig. I let the random gods decide what comes on next.

    • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gonna need some machine learning for this. How much AI in your streaming service are you comfortable with?

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        AI and ML based recommendation engines in streaming services have been a thing for as long as there have been steaming services

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            This sounds like a bit of a slippery slope fallacy, if you’re implying that a steaming service using a recommendation algorithm obviously concludes with sinister personalised AI brainwashing injected into my watching, I think you maybe should watch less black mirror.

            If you didn’t mean that, we’ve been using AI in film and TV for ages now, the latest batch of Star wars films made extensive use of it. Hell, the huge battles in lord of the rings used a rudimentary AI system for governing all the entities in it.

            • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m just working my way to asking if you’d watch personalized AI TV bruh, not purposely attempting a fallacy. I’d give it a look, maybe once or twice. Just to see 😂

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        As someone very hesitant about AI I’m comfortable with it. It’s a streaming service, not my email inbox.

        • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          One step further: ai “enhanced” TV shows and movies

          We still good, or you ready to start pitching a fit?

    • dumbass@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was a chrome extension a few years ago called ottoplay that did something like this, would take your Netflix Hulu and YouTube accounts and set up channels like comedy movies and shit like that, would play random episode non stop.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They usually are though. Most content (excluding their own) is not available in all regions due to licensing issues.

      • d3Xt3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most content (excluding their own) is not available in all regions due to licensing issues.

        Actually, even including their own for some dumb reason. For instance, Paramount holds the rights to Star Trek, but there’s no way for me to stream some of the shows legally, because Paramount+ isn’t available where I live.

        Which to me makes no sense. It’s just a freaking website, globally accessible, hosting content they own…

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Expanding to other countries can probably be a bit complicated and maybe they don’t feel like it’s worth it.

          Personally I barely care about copyright laws, and in cases like these I don’t give a single fuck. I won’t call the piracy justified like the deranged people in r/piracy (and especially it’s Lemmy equivalent) would. It’s not like I deserve to watch the content or anything, I just don’t care

  • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You all should check out criterion channel. Definitely more art house style but a great value.

  • brenstar@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Minus ad breaks, I missed this aspect of content consumption. Choosing to watch a random episode of a random show just doesn’t happen and I missed being able to just “see what’s on”. I spent a fair amount of time setting up random “channels” I can tune into that play random episodes from tv shows on my media server and it’s great.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of newer shows cannot be watched randomly though because the episodes actually build upon each other.

      If you take older shows like TNG or X files: you could easily jump back in after missing half a season. The episodes were written to be mostly self-contained, because missing an episode or two because of life was very very common. Season finales were often a major exception, and were therefore also majority advertised so people knew to plan around them.

      If you write a show for streaming, however, there is no concept of “missing an episode”. So the writers are freed from that constraint, and subsequently write shows that are only meant to be watched in their entirety, in order.

      • Tamo240@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Interesting to see it as being freed from a constraint rather than a crutch that viewers can be relied upon to watch all episodes. IMO writing satisfying one episode arc that also makes up part of a wider arc is much more difficult, and many shows now really have just a single arc that only gets good in the last third, making it essentially a 6-8 hour movie rather than an episodic show.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah, you can definitely see a trend towards more HBO style shows as streaming took off.

        I remember watching an episode of The Wire, and somebody else watched it with me and didn’t like it because they didn’t know what was going on and the story wasn’t resolved in an hour. I’m like 10 episodes in, and this ain’t Columbo.

  • notsure@fedia.io
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m old enough to remember the promise that cable TV was paid so you wouldn’t have commercials…it lasted what, 6 months? The channels without commercials cost extra…le sigh

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The predictable backstop of subscription plus the nearly limitless potential upside of ad sales is just too tempting in the long run for media companies. They get to have their cake and eat it too. Spotify, Amazon, Netflix and have all eventually given in, despite insisting they never would. Shareholder owned media companies will always gravitate to this model. It’s the only way to maximize quarterly revenue growth.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep. It was pretty clear streaming services were always going to end up the same way from the start. Even YouTube has, although that was harder to predict when it was mostly 30s cat videos.

  • Ismay@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pretty wild to want to add channel when:

    • their interface is garbage
    • their content is pretty lacking

    If they play any “pay for that channel”, it’s insta unsub

    • olutukko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      only reason I still have disney+ is because my cousin used to borrow it from me. then I stopped paying for it and he was too lazy to make his own account to he just started paying mine. I’ve had free disney+ for year and a half now

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The most frustrating thing about their interface is that if you’ve already watched an episode of something, then try to watch it again, it’ll immediately minimize it to start the “next episode” countdown.

      It’s been ongoing.

      And Disney+ is so crowded with garbage now that they’ve integrated Hulu’s content into it.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like to sail through the 7 seas: No ads, no monthly payments, all content in only one website. Best deal! Aye aye!🏴‍☠️

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I always have trouble watching Disney streams. Bad quality, buffering, slow loading. I usually just pirate the show and switch to Plex because apparently I can run a better streaming service than Disney.

    • TK420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m already thinking about it. I can’t watch new content outside the service, so if I’m torrenting for long term storage regardless, why am I paying in the first place?

  • dellish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let me guess: which channels you have access to depend on your subscription level? Fuck these jerks.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And they make sure that you have to buy the full package to get what you want.

      New movie releases only costs $10 per streaming on the platinum-full-extended-live-ultra-package.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    man, piracy, i mean owning physical media, seems like a better and better method of enjoying media.

    It’s a good thing every show ever has been released on physical media. Right? Right?

    • DickFiasco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If pirating it and saving to a thumb drive counts as physical media, then yeah, I guess.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      they hyped up X-Men 97 for months and then didn’t bring it to my region. i don’t even know how there would be copyright issues since it’s an original. they just want me to stop paying and start sailing.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          but it’s THEIR SHOW i don’t get what copyright problems they would have… i understand when they have licensed shows from other companies, syndication etc but why not release original shows everywhere? Netflix does it.