• Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    In fascist rhetoric the enemy is always both weak and strong. It’s a real easy indicator that you’re hearing propaganda.

    • Exosus@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I guess that explains how republicans are incompetent but also easily destroy the country during 4 years in power

    • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Not being political here, just thinking logically. Isn’t it possible for a subgroup of a large group to do X while another subgroup of the same large group does Y?

      I’m not sure if these options are mutually exclusive when it comes to large sets of individuals.

      This is just logical thinking, I have no statistics and this is not a political stance.

      • defame@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        That was my first thought as well. Assuming a large enough amount of immigrants, they could be overwhelming both the welfare system and the job market. A sufficiently large group of additional people would overwhelm every system, and depending on the preexisting conditions, that group might not need to be all that big

        • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s kinda hard to overwhelm the job market tho, at least if the economy is growing. In that case, more workers would likely facilitate growth, since the growing workforce will also have money to spend and create demand. If the market was already very competitive, things would be different, but developed countries are usually hungry for skilled workers. Demographics dictate this will only become more true as time passes

  • OpenStars@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I found it hilarious when many California farmers (e.g. fruits) voted for Trump, then got angry when he immediately started cutting back on immigration - like what the hell did you think he meant when he talked about that EVERY SINGLE TIME!? That man isn’t exactly known for using “metaphors” or having the slightest degree of “subtlety” - e.g. when he talks about grabbing pussy, he doesn’t mean getting to know someone intimately, he means to GRAB someone’s ACTUAL genitalia, which simply being within arms reach seems to imply automatically giving consent, and if not then you can take it up with his team of lawyers.

    After that, people started dying, and other things happened like infants were literally ripped right out of their mothers’ arms and I suddenly found it less funny:-(.

    I guess arguably it could be funny to think how liberals get mad when the Democrats they vote for do not do what they promised, yet Trump supporters got mad at him when he did - if that situation were not so fucking tragic for us all:-(.

    Edit:

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      We just played the anti-immigrant game in Florida. Harsh legislation passed, they ran away, and fuck me, crops are rotting in the fields.

      There were a couple of business owners brave enough to say it out loud on video. “Well, yeah, we wanted this legislation, but just to kinda scare 'em. We didn’t think we’d actually lose our workers! Maybe we gotta rethink this whole thing.”

      Props to those few self-aware SeaWolves. Some are getting it.

      If you want slave labor, you gotta put up with slaves living on the plantation.